Who Shall We Get Next?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by candletrader, Feb 2, 2003.

  1. Monsoon

    Monsoon

    france :D
     
    #11     Feb 2, 2003
  2. msfe

    msfe

    liberate and democratize monaco and the vatican state
     
    #12     Feb 2, 2003
  3. ROFL!
     
    #13     Feb 2, 2003
  4. A remote valley in the Swiss Alps.
     
    #14     Feb 2, 2003
  5. Josh_B

    Josh_B

    According to Sunday Herald:

    China is up for regime change, along with North Korea, Libya, Syria and Iran.


    ...The PNAC document supports a 'blueprint for maintaining global US pre-eminence, precluding the rise of a great power rival, and shaping the international security order in line with American principles and interests'.

    This 'American grand strategy' must be advanced for 'as far into the future as possible', the report says. It also calls for the US to 'fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theatre wars' as a 'core mission'.

    The report describes American armed forces abroad as 'the cavalry on the new American frontier'. The PNAC blueprint supports an earlier document written by Wolfowitz and Libby that said the US must 'discourage advanced industrial nations from challenging our leadership or even aspiring to a larger regional or global role'.

    The PNAC report also:

    l refers to key allies such as the UK as 'the most effective and efficient means of exercising American global leadership';

    l describes peace-keeping missions as 'demanding American political leadership rather than that of the United Nations';

    l reveals worries in the administration that Europe could rival the USA;

    l says 'even should Saddam pass from the scene' bases in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait will remain permanently -- despite domestic opposition in the Gulf regimes to the stationing of US troops -- as 'Iran may well prove as large a threat to US interests as Iraq has';

    l spotlights China for 'regime change' saying 'it is time to increase the presence of American forces in southeast Asia'. This, it says, may lead to 'American and allied power providing the spur to the process of democratisation in China';

    l calls for the creation of 'US Space Forces', to dominate space, and the total control of cyberspace to prevent 'enemies' using the internet against the US;

    l hints that, despite threatening war against Iraq for developing weapons of mass destruction, the US may consider developing biological weapons -- which the nation has banned -- in decades to come. It says: 'New methods of attack -- electronic, 'non-lethal', biological -- will be more widely available ... combat likely will take place in new dimensions, in space, cyberspace, and perhaps the world of microbes ... advanced forms of biological warfare that can 'target' specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool';

    l and pinpoints North Korea, Libya, Syria and Iran as dangerous regimes and says their existence justifies the creation of a 'world-wide command-and-control system'.

    Tam Dalyell, the Labour MP, father of the House of Commons and one of the leading rebel voices against war with Iraq, said: 'This is garbage from right-wing think-tanks stuffed with chicken-hawks -- men who have never seen the horror of war but are in love with the idea of war. Men like Cheney, who were draft-dodgers in the Vietnam war.

    'This is a blueprint for US world domination -- a new world order of their making. These are the thought processes of fantasist Americans who want to control the world. I am appalled that a British Labour Prime Minister should have got into bed with a crew which has this moral standing.'..

    http://www.sundayherald.com/27735

    Pakistan doesn't seem to make this article, but the taliban links with Pakistan are just too great to stay ignored if we are to attack them.

    Josh
     
    #15     Feb 2, 2003
  6. tuna

    tuna

    'This is a blueprint for US world domination

    Someone finally waking up to the 21st century Romans huh.
    The UN is supposed to be the world voting together.At present the US thinks its above that,i.e "with or without UN approval were off to Iraq" mentality.
    I don't know who's next candle but i think you'll find yourselves off on your own once the public of your present allies start voting out the US puppet followers like Blair and Howard.
    Perhaps the US voters (yourself included)will do the same to Bush once they see suicide bombings or the like on the streets of the US rather than just action on CNN via satellite tv
     
    #16     Feb 2, 2003
  7. Ernie Barsimian
     
    #17     Feb 3, 2003
  8. I say we fight several wars simultaneously... let's nuke the entire Middle East (cos they got a bad taste in fashion headwear and, anyway, they have no right to have all that oil), China (just in case they learn to play the capitalist game better than us), Pakistan (cos they're evil dewers), India (to show that we are even-handed if we nuke the Pakistanis), Russia (just in case they go commie), North Korea (cos they are a threat to the civilized world) and various North African countries (for fun)... I am sure we have a few spare nukes...

    God Bless America... let's smoke em out and give em justice... let's get the evil dewers... we are the country of God... so let's whip some terrorist ass... we're gonna rule da freakin' world... make no mistake about it... yeeehaaaaa

    We are good, the rest of the world is evil... God Bless America... it's our God-given right to defend the Civilized World (us) from the Evil Dewers... so let's start the nuking...
     
    #18     Feb 3, 2003
  9. Ninja

    Ninja

    Do you think that the 71.000 US soldiers in more than 50 military bases in Germany will like that?
     
    #19     Feb 3, 2003
  10. Steady dude! If 'Phantom' sees this he might take you seriously, and report it to his local FBI field office!
     
    #20     Feb 3, 2003