yes, its not new, however. i call it the "cult of the plain speaking joes". woodie and the murrey math dude fit the criteria for this cult. surfer
marketsurfer: In another thread, you recently posted the following: "the indicator was not hammered. blind, guru following, cheerleading of the indicator and outrageous bogus claims were hammered---as they should be. surfer" I ask again, as I did in almost every one of my previous posts, where are these outrageous bogus claims that you and others keep referencing? The only thing I ever saw were personal attacks launched against anyone who pointed out their own personal expereinces. These posters were guilty of nothing other than responding to the original questions posed at the onset of this thread...
I sometimes wonder what it is like for Baron here....He must sit on his hands and read all this.... Michael B.
After reading posts here I am wondering why there would even be a NEGATIVE post....the room is free, your choice to go there or not...I choose to go there....why refer to his room as a cult? People being grateful is more appropriate...profitability is determined on an individual basis...your STOP!!! Just let it be...and I must add...Jack...my sense is your a frustrated trader striking out...why? I guess your name says it all.. later, Peace, love, and light
Lol. this is Michael but you can call me jack....you are speaking to me correct? The hotcomm room is not free ...unless Woodie has reduced his kickback....Now don't get in a huff...i do not know if this is true and I don't care as I am not a member. Hey anybody is entitled to make a buck.....its a free world....lol Can we talk about trading now? pr1, How have you found Woodies pay-room to be helpful to you? Would you mind sharing? Michael B. Integrity, Honesty and non-pretencious attitude. sorry this peace love and light crap are for the "good" people
After reading the article on Stock and Commodity magazine about HotComm and Woodie, I would think the article could be quite Misleading to make readers feel like the two brands are the same company. Perhaps Woodie should not be associated (willingly or unwillingly) with this type of joint promotion, in order to avoid misleading (and suspicion) to the readers and the general public. Probably Woodie should make a statement soonest to clarify the above problem and confusion, to reduce our arguments here.