who is 'Scientist'?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by funky, Oct 19, 2003.

  1. ..it's the real me back. Sorry for that. But the kid did have a point about EUREX. The REAL volume is here aux Etats-Unis. That is why EUREX has this reverse Marshall plan going. We brash colonials look forward with relish to a more convenient way to separate you old-worlders from your Euros. We may need them to buy Russian oil.

    You are somewhat behind the times on your surgically implemented fetishes. Here in LA, a surgeon and a couturier have just teamed up to introduce the concept of the transgendered transsexual, wherein one can be totally confused as to one's true sexual identity.

    Best regards, and good trading to you today. If you are trading GLOBEX today, you might want to follow my trade journal, a rare (thankfully) one day only event. Remember: REAL men TRADE.
     
    #71     Oct 20, 2003
  2. ..and I can't read a word of it. Can you translate, please? Thanks.
     
    #72     Oct 20, 2003
  3. Not funny.
    The 6 generous vote from hypostomus and the other vote are what we all say.
    Please leave.
     
    #73     Oct 20, 2003
  4. You mean me? :)
    Sorry if you feel I have insulted you at some point. I don't remember having done so, and if so, don't remember.

    Please correct me if I'm wrong.

    If not - YOU please leave. Since this thread concerns me and contains my name in subject, I have all right to be here - Unlike you, if you decide to be insulent or destructive. Period.

    Good Luck.
     
    #74     Oct 20, 2003
  5. Well, we have vote and chosen you as a subject, and never given any right to you. You are not entiltled for anything. Maybe just for some IQ test result.:D
     
    #75     Oct 20, 2003
  6. From what I can see, 39% of votes are on the "con" side, 71% are on the "pro" side.

    I have already beaten Jack. What am I doing wrong? How come so many people believe I'm for real? :p

    Scientist.
     
    #76     Oct 20, 2003
  7. Just in case you don't know, you do Math wrong, scientist.

    41 ppl vote, the one multi-vote 6.
    Therefore, 40 neggative, and one possitive, which is from his generousity.
     
    #77     Oct 20, 2003
  8. OK, all fine by me. How about a rectal search on the "subject"? Is that required, too?

    Then you could hire "No Gloves" Inandlong, a former practicing proctologist, to conduct the consultation.

    Possibly I could squeeze out some trading secrets during the process (out of Inandlong, I mean)

    Aaah. We're getting too visual here. Enough of that. :cool:
     
    #78     Oct 20, 2003
  9. Because scientists usually do things based on facts that must be real, I would guess. :confused:
     
    #79     Oct 20, 2003
  10. Nono wait a sec, Smoothy! :D

    The multi-vote by Hypostomus was a joke, hype has hardly a single account on ET. One of the 6 votes on option 4 was voted by me, and a lion share say I trade, but exxagerate. Which to me is absolutely encouraging, since it tells me I must be doing something right. Since I (only myself) know that I don't tend to exxagerate (in fact there's a lot I haven't even said), this tells me uh-huh. So they (who think I'm exxagerating) consider my statements as "exxagerated", since it exceeds their personal performances or expectations of trading possibilities.

    Makes any sense? Makes perfect sense to me. Keep it simple. :cool:

    Scientist.
     
    #80     Oct 20, 2003