Hill will publish any editorial for clicks, they are left of profits. And I could care less who he worked for, these people are for hire and will do anything for money, this is not journalism, good journalism doesn't ask loaded questions with an agenda. Thanks for your psychoanalysis, not interested.
Mueller has got to be furious. His case against the Russian Troll Farm is in tatters and now Michael Avenatti fucks him royally. A lawyer representing a BBC-ATM porno slut appearing unchallenged all over the media, whose release of information regarding Cohen possibly compromises the standing of his case - turns out to be a CROOK named in more than 50 state and federal complaints, has serious tax fraud issues, is the subject of an active California Bar complaint, and is a fucking idiot for such a virtue signaling moral arbiter with such a debauched background himself. WTF.
I smell a big frigging rat when Avenatti keeps saying that he is not getting political operative funds for his work because 100% of his funds come from his client or gofundme donors. Yeh right. Political operatives hand out money to their cronies who then contribute it to avenatti's gofundme page as instructed.
At least 3,000 over the course of his career. Last time I checked Anderson Cooper, Bill Maher, and the entire CNN staff hate Trump and swallowed Avenatti’s load no questions asked - held him out as a moral arbiter in fact.
Link to video where they said that? And by your logic, him being sued should disqualify him from being a lawyer but not trump from being the president?
I’ve already seen it. Prove me wrong - show me where they question him about the 50 plus state and federal complaints and tax fraud charges and California Bar investigation. They don’t. Their eagerness for narrative blinds them.
Well to be fair if we disqualified Presidential Candidates based upon past and active legal actions neither Hillary nor Trump would have qualified. Hell, Bernie’s wife is getting the snot sued out of her.
We'll see. And if he is, then Cohen and Trump are in serious trouble, because it takes one to really know one.
Well, you use the word "should" which is different than what the law may or may not be - and the law/constitution is what governs. Like it or not. Having multiple civil and even criminal judgements against you does not qualify you from being president, although it may make you a lousy candidate- or not. However, lawyers are bound by licensing rules. If you are a lawyer and are sued for some civil matter than does not involve criminal or moral or ethical matters probably that is not a problem as long as it is not habit. But there have been articles that I have only skimmed where avenattis name appears in the same sentence with words like fraud, tax evasion, etc. And yes, he would be disbarred in his state or before the federal bar where those crimes rise to the level of a felony. But he can still run for president if he wants, even if he is in the slam.