Then why has this talking point of "bringing democracy to Iraq" gained so much traction among the right wing? That wasnât even remotely considered when this admin was selling this war. And now thatâs all you hear from these robotrons. Itâs disgusting that they would suck so much party dick as to repeat that blatantly false bullshit even after all these years when our blood and lives and treasure are being pissed away.
3 sets of people hate Obama. 1/ neocons. The 10,000 or so republican elite and what I call their 25 percentile supporters. The large number of degenerates in the US population who still support bush. 2/ racists, supremacists and imperialists. We all know latent racism is a core belief of a large part of southern culture. Imperialists suffer from delusions of grandeur. For the most part, members of this group are also in group 1. 3/ zionists. These are christians and jews who hate america and put Israels interests before their own. Many of this group also make up the elite population of group 1 only those who hate america support bush. Therefore a vote for Obama, is a vote AGAINST Bush ( aka Hittlery and McCain). You're not actually voting for Obama, you're voting against Bush.
That's why I voted for bush. I wasn't really voting for him, but against John Fairy and Al (I invented the internet) Gore.
if obama wins oil will go to 50, the market will crash, the dollar will rally and web 2.0 will cease to exist.
Identifies with group 1, 2. group 3 on occassion when Fox shows bush crying at the wall in jerusalem. doesn't have a clue what economics is. Had to use spell checker to spell correctly. supports a candidate, not because of qualifications, but group identification. a true 25 percentile bush supporter. hates america, doesn't know it because of congenital brain defect. so he supports a candidate versed in economics? let us see....... <object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/kqGWTh_NZ-0&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/kqGWTh_NZ-0&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object> yes, ZERO% interest would be great. unfortunately it's only for the 10,000 elite of group 1. the 25 percentiles just tag along.
hey pissedgoy, this isn't about Bush, its about Obama. the guy wants to raise taxes across the board, and add a whole slew of social programs. Just what we need. The most damaging will be raising cap gains to 25%. Back in the 80's when they were this high, they were high in the rest of the world too. not true any more. guess where where billions in investment capital is going to go? To make matters worse, it will not raise additional revenue. this has already been shown to be the case. People just hold their stocks longer. it is simply an Obama attempt to redistribute wealth. You do understand that out of 100 senators, Obama has the most socialistic voting record. By far! Scary thought with an overwhelmingly democrat congress. Bye bye stock market. i don't like mac either, but far superior to obama. mac has already admitted he is weak in Econ. he will just lean on people who know their shit. Far better than having some socialist with a rubber stamp Congress at the helm.
Good point on having to compete in the world with capital gains taxes . I read everywhere that Mac has little knowledge about the econ. Yet , I also read , usally in the same article , how bad Obama's econ plan is (i agree). Seems safer with someone who knows little and does little then someone who's thinks he knows and does much.