Well now I’m reading that it was low altitude cruise missiles launched from Iran, near the Iraq border. That changes a lot but it’s still difficult to believe Iran would launch an attack on Saudi Arabia from their own soil. It seems crazy.
I don't really see how the Saudis can let this go without hitting Iran back. Otherwise it looks like Iran can punk them anytime they wish.
There is no "winning" for us in this middle east war without killing every f'n one of them, and I mean every single one. We can stand back, hope they contain it among themselves and help them pick up the pieces when it's over, or kill them all, Jews included. I suspect we'll choose a third option, stick our nose where it doesn't belong, continue to get bloody and broke, all for a bunch of ungrateful fucks who will always hate us regardless of what happens.
http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,463779,00.html So, the White House is not contesting the fact that the President made a false claim — merely whether he, or those who prepared his speech, knew at the time that it was false. And holding the line forces White House press secretary Ari Fleischer into a rhetorical dance that can only be called Clintonesque: conceding on the one hand that the claim made by the President was based on forged evidence that Iraq had tried to buy "yellow cake" refined uranium from Niger, but at the same time maintaining that "I see nothing that goes broader that would indicate that there was no basis to the President's broader statement." http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/WO0307/S00099.htm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niger_uranium_forgeries