Jack's method is exceptional. I'd describe my current state as more like adding on and looking to integrate. It's not easily transferable though and is manually intensive to achieve high performance. A current side project is automating it but my programming skills are not quite up to par yet. So many ideas, so little time.
If Jack's method is exceptional - why spend time on anything else? I hear you on having too many ideas and too little time. Admittedly, research and testing takes a ton of time. However, one only needs one good method/system for day trading.
Being engaged with the data is partially responsible for the exceptionalism. Don't be quick to automate in it's entirety. Just saying. Here is YM, 3 min, from about 7:30am pst to about 15 min ago.... And, here come the distracters!
1) Increasing discernment though increasing one’s “spectrum of differentiation.” 2) Stacking probabilities 3) I’m on a path of Mastery and it’s fun. Exploring, comparing and contrasting other methodologies is a natural extension of the above perspectives.
Tiddlywinks! I concur. Off topic and another shout out for your recommend of Logseq, it's become an essential tool and always learning new capacities. I've yet to add any of my JHM documentation to my current graph..
Cool Beans!! Here's my trading-business graph ... That outer ring of orphans...So many ideas, so little time! FWIW... I'm working on some JH related graphs for public consumption. Just this weekend I opened a CloudFlare account for hosting. Went with Cloudflare instead of Netlify due to CF security features. I'm shooting for an eoy publish, but really IDK. You made a mindmap of threads... I'm thinking about putting that into logseq and making a clickable TOC to JH threads as a test.
Switch lock edge. Entire curve above x and can take -360 bps lower on vol-shift. Convex tail for portfolio-prot. Resets every morning in the first half hour of the day session. 36D at inception; 860 terminal. PM/RBH-account requires ZERO buying power.