Who are more convincing liars, Repubs or Dems?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by ZZZzzzzzzz, Feb 15, 2006.

Who are the better liars?

  1. Democrats

    10 vote(s)
    31.3%
  2. Republicans

    22 vote(s)
    68.8%
  1. Pabst

    Pabst

    References to inbred, stupid Southern whites dose little to raise your ire. Yet you take note if the fact is stated that blacks (20% of Kerry's votes) are America's most prolific, cunning, and accomplished liars.

    As far as the personal attacks. Don't tempt me. I'll cut your mother fucking head off. Try me loser.
     
    #31     Feb 16, 2006
  2. Excuse me, are you threatening me with physical violence?

    Just for the record.

     
    #32     Feb 16, 2006
  3. Banjo

    Banjo

    I did not have sex with that woman :D
     
    #33     Feb 16, 2006
  4. Oh yeah!!!

    Who actually believed him when he said that though?

    Dems are lousy liars....

    Most of the Dems I know thought he was lying at the time....they just didn't think it was worth trying to impeach.



     
    #34     Feb 16, 2006
  5. Arnie

    Arnie

    What policy? The Dems are berift of ideas, much less a "policy"

    Pop quiz, boys and girls.

    What is the Democratic policy on terrorism
    How about the budget
    How about Social Security
    How about Medicare
    How about "your choice here"
     
    #35     Feb 16, 2006
  6. That was a major policy and government business related lie, wasn't it?
     
    #36     Feb 16, 2006


  7. What is the Democratic policy on terrorism
    Catch Osama. Destroy Al-Qaeda, secure borders, secure ports, leave Iraq.

    How about the budget
    Balance the budget, Clinton did

    How about Social Security
    Is there a problem? Social security's fine till 2040.

    How about Medicare
    Universal Healthcare
     
    #37     Feb 16, 2006
  8. What policy? The Dems are berift of ideas, much less a "policy"

    Pop quiz, boys and girls.


    What is the Democratic policy on terrorism

    A. Against it.

    How about the budget

    A. Balance it.

    How about Social Security

    A. Provide it. How about locking that box?

    How about Medicare

    A. Yes.
     
    #38     Feb 16, 2006
  9. Actually, I agree with you. I mean, who cares if the head of 1 branch of govt lies to the other. It's not like it would set a precedent.

    What bothered me more was his abuse of power...

    Travelgate - fires the old guy to put his crony in. Ok by me, buuut when the guy complains about it, Clinton didn't like it, makes a few calls, and next thing ya know, he's being investigated by the IRS. He got a rebate, by the way..

    Ken Starr got investigated by the IRS too - a connection too? Oh, he got a rebate too...

    Clinton's bouncer buddy's in the WH as some kind of security assistant or whatever. Next thing you know, they're calling the FBI and have like, 900 confidential Republican personnel files just lying around. Files that the FBI never should have let go in the first place - more abuse of power?

    There's more....

    And abuse of power IS an impeachable offense.....
     
    #39     Feb 17, 2006
  10. So why wasn't he impeached on these charges? Certainly not for the lack of trying, did not Ken Starr spend years, 40 million dollars and came up with a sperm stained dress?
     
    #40     Feb 17, 2006