when I posted it in the article, it did not hyperlink it. I had to edit it several times. Again, if I wanted to hide something, I'd simply not link it. Like Spike Trader does. You can see it any time you want by hover it. I don't plan to change the method in which I do this, so you can rightly piss off.
I notice that you only don't post the url when the source is questionable and is not a mainstream media outlet. This is a transparency issue.
Lets make a bet. I will give you 10 examples of a main stream media outlet where I have done precisely what I did here. When I show you this, you will agree to leave the site for a month, right? If I cannot, I will leave for a month. I mean, you're so sure, right? Lets do the bet.
Yeah... and people will provide 10 examples where you provided the url. Can you provide one example where you posted information from a questionable non-MSM news source and provided the url? I think not.
If I do, will you leave the forum for a month? You stated "you only don't post the url when the source is questionable and is not a mainstream media outlet." Are you going to amend this statement, bet on it, or weasel out of it? Now you've stated "Can you provide one example where you posted information from a questionable non-MSM news source and provided the url? I think not." Do you want to bet on this statement? I mean, if I'm going to waste time putting you in that hole you crawled out of, I'd like there to be a payoff.
so is that a bet? Accept and we're on. Clarify if we are betting on your first accusation, your second, or both. I am happy either way. Both statements of yours are false.
GWB? Oh, come on now man...don't flake out when we're this close. Don't go silent. We on or what? Say when.
I won't give you the pleasure of a one month break from ET. You will have to endure reading about DeSantis' latest fiascos each day.