Not quite. <iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Iy0J5Z4LWgE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> I use about double the weight (dumbbells held at the sides) for 10 reps per leg on the first set. How 'bout them tatts, eh?
Please stop being an idiot. I once respected you. I really did. Those days are gone. You may be different in real life, but you're an asshole here.
Do you even notice how you never address anyone's question? You know who you act like? Michelle Bachmann. It's like you're reading off of a script. I ask a question and you keep on with your talking points. It's annoying when she does it and it's annoying when you do it. You don't have to agree with me. You don't have to change your mind, but can you at least address people's questions when asked. It's getting really old hat man. You're 54 dude, you should behave better then this.
Professionally speaking here for the benefit of lurkers. Pistol squats while they look impressive are not good for your knees, especially weighted. It's probably best not to exceed 100*of knee flexion nor bounce at the bottom . 90* will do just fine for muscular development and help keep your knees healthy.
No, you're the child. You ask a stupid question and expect a respectful answer. Doesn't work that way. (Remember the response equity thing?) I've answered intelligent questions of yours in the past. I won't waste my time on stupid ones that you should know better than to even ask.
Yeah, except that's full of crap. While I used to do barbell squats to parallel and no further, pistols are different. They just are. And until you try them, your "professional" opinion isn't worth the "paper" it's posted on. I'm 54, and my knees are just fine. Have you actually ever tried them? Butt to heel, heel on the ground, knees not forward beyond toes. Oh, you'll feel tension, but not so much in your knees.
That's a cop out and you know it. So let me "try" to ask you something. Do you think it's fair that Romney ignores questions from the media. What keeps him from pulling a "gabby" where he says that's a stupid question and won't answer it? See, if that is the new standard then everyone can refuse to answer questions. This is a message board Gabby. People ask stupid questions. It's a not a court of law. But you do understand that it's pointless for you to even post down here if you are going to ignore 90% of the questions people ask you. Then the guys on the right will do the same. Then we get two people talking over each other asking each other questions with no responses. This is precisely why message boards degenerate into name calling and ad hominem. Because once you take answering questions off the table, all that is left is name calling.
They already do! Every time I explained Keynesian policy as Keynes had intended (rather than how it was merely blamed), my remarks are either ignored or purposefully taken out of context. I refuse to revisit that rabbit hole. Ricter has posted some excellent commentary on economics and he gets laughed at by those too stupid to even grasp what he writes. Your question wasn't really a question, it was a posture. And I choose not to give it legs at my expense. Seriously, mav, I've had my fill of you for a time. I have less trouble responding in kind to guys like peil and phoenix because I never respected them.