What we know for a fact is that this guy was not part of any mainstream political movement, right or left. He was a radical, and trying to imply he was mainstream right or left is beneath intelligent debate. Neo Nazis are not part of any republican party anymore than the anarchists are part of of the dem party. Radicals attempt to hi-jack the message from both parties and the morons in the media give them voice as if they are legit elements of a politcal party. Ratings don't ya' know. The media doesn't really care who wins so long as there's a fight, and those in the media will happily stir the pot to the point of bloodshed whenever they can. After all, how do you fill 24/7 of time with 15 minutes of actual daily news?
Shopping for strawmen? No one suggested mainstream. But trying to obfuscate left vs right here, and you're going to need a shitload of straw.
And I bet if you were a lamb you would go for a walk with a wolf in sheep's clothing. Meanwhile, the thinking contingent among us judge groups by their actions rather than by the marketing they use to get a foothold. If you are actually equating fascism with socialism, then all I can say is, "Tard indeed."
I guess you think George W Bush is a liberal then. LOL. His "actions" created another big government entitlement program, another government department (homeland security), massively expanded the size of government and used Keynesian policies to deal with the Wall Street mess. In other words, he was a liberal. I mean, by your definition of course. LOL.
This just in. The Right doesn't know Keynes from canes, apart from it being a convenient whipping boy for all that ails them. Ignorance, willful or otherwise, is a tragic thing. That is all.
This just in. Gabby again ignores the question. Piers Morgan will be doing a one hour exclusive interview with Gabby in light of this breaking news in which Gabby will sit there for one hour and not answer a single question. Stay tuned for details...