Data: a set of values of qualitative or quantitative variables; restated, pieces of data are individual pieces of information. No such stipulation is accepted. Sorry.
One of the big causes liberals and race hustlers are pushing these days is what they claim to be disparate school suspension rates for blacks. To accept their theory, you have to first assume that public school administrators, who voted for Obama probably at the 90% rate, are closet racists. Then you have to accept that the only possible reason for the disparity is racism. This mirrors the argument that black men are imprisoned at higher rates solely because fo racism. Bottom line, the same liberals who endlessly proclaim their support for education, yada yada yada, would prefer to leave violent and disruptive "students" in the classroom if they are black rather than have a safe and productive learning environment for those actually trying to learn. Of course, what do they care? Their kids are in an all white private school with armed guards and strict discipline policies.
Perhaps if 40%+ of low-income schools got their fair share of state and local funds, these problems might not be so troublesome. Or not exist at all.
A leftist meme. More money thrown into an inept corrupt bureaucracy does not yield better results. Just more wasted money, dumb ass.
How can you possibly come to the conclusion that black violence in schools has a connection to funding? Even Richter is not that obtuse.
If you were truly interested in finding out rather than repeat rightwing dogma, you could compare those urban schools that are fully-funded with those that are not, controlling of course the variables such as racial and ethnic composition. But why do I not think you will do that?
You're off topic again. I'm talking about the consequences of violence in schools. Liberals are arguing that black males get suspended at a disproportionate rate, but they don't want to talk about the fact that they commit a disproportionate share of violence. If liberals truly cared about education, they would want a safe learning environment and would not sacrifice the chances of the kids who are there to learn. In typical liberal fashion however, they want those who play by the rules to suffer so they can feel good about themselves by making quixotic efforts to save gangbangers. Or more likely, it is just an excuse for more race hustling.
Not off-topic at all. You're making a number of assumptions that do not necessarily have any grounding in reality because you've never really thought about it or bothered to look at the data without prejudice (i.e., prejudging). Therefore, you rant dogma. But at least you have tons of company.
The only ones who are unaware, are the ones who refuse to see the truth for what it is. We've all known about the "white privilege" I spoke of. It's not "behind the scenes" either, it's everywhere- it's our culture. Perhaps because you see it as "backhanded" is the reason you choose to put yourself in the "unaware" crowd. Oh, well shit, That has really been happening? oh damn, I never would of thunk, so, er... I guess that sucks, but, at least I'm not to blame cause I sure as heck haven't noticed any of that, but now that you mention it, well gosh...ops: It's much better to just accept it for what it is; admit it, then (maybe) people won't think you're crazy when you act like it doesn't exist. Hoof