I remember taking several required humanities classes, but nothing hard core philosophical. I certainly never took anything debate related. But even then I'm pretty sure, "I'm right and you're wrong" isn't considered a legitimate argument.
Tao let the cat out of the bag so to speak. Just remind fraudcunts of his experimental sex with his gay brother while they were growing up. And you'll be on his ignore list faster than he can bend over and grab his ankles.
Looking through some old posts I noticed that others who did that still didn't make the cut, so you must be adding something I can't quite nail down but is clearly worth aspiring to.
Now you've gone and done it. The entire liberal argument philosophy is now destroyed. It's like a million fraudcurrents cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.
But despite that, won't the liberal tenets of dishonesty, detachment from reality and no shame keep them marching in the same direction like lemmings?
Lets see where the intelligence came from in the CIA. Because it looks like some desk made the video up contrary to the intelligence they were receiving. And even then... I am not sure they did not get the video idea from Clinton herself. So link us to the proof the CIA told Hillary about the demonstrations in cairo... but lets also find out where the video idea came from. remember they were anticipating attacks in cairo. finally, how did an idea about a demonstration get into talking points... when there was no demonstration in benghazi before the attack. In short... it looks like there was no demonstration and the video idea may have been dreamed up by Clinton as cover.