Didn't you mean black girl attacks white girl holding a baby and doesn't care one bit if the baby could of had it's neck broken? Okay, I thought you did. Good job. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/teen-rips-girl-toddler-hair-video-article-1.2273815
No, I meant that when you guys are done burning down black churches, then we can talk about who are the thugs and who are the victims. Until then, it's just the same old white supremacist search for justifications for their bigotry.
Interesting that all eight of the active investigations about burning of black churches have all been declared not to be arson over the past few days. They were due to lightening storms, electrical wiring shorts, and other traditional non-arson issues.
Lightening must be racist. BTW, what color were the people who installed the wiring that shorted out? Besides what color was the wire that they said shorted out? I bet they claimed it was the black wire. Why do these racists have to blame the black wire?
Where is the film of a white girl savagely attacking a black girl and a baby??? Still waiting.... Oh that's right, it doesn't exist because only in the fatherless black community are family values and morals so low that someone would attack a child holding an infant.