I find out there are at least 3 versions. The original one, and two other edited version. I cannot understand what the original one tries to say sometimes espeically the tape format is so different from now and I still don't get what he tried to present. The two editied one seem like easier to understand but one is full of technical analysis stuff which is not what the original one tried to say at all, and I don't know can I trust the another one. What do you suggest? Besides, base on what I read so far the tape reading is more like an art base on experience but no scientific prove from historical data or statistical point of view at all. It is just pure his own experience. What do you think?
Three versions and none is found on google ? It's possible that technical analysis captures it. When you read old books about "Tape Reading", It usually refers to some form of technical analysis. I think of Livermore or Wyckoff (Studies in Tape Reading). Actually they call tapes what we would call charts ... It's simply a record of time and price (Ticker Tape) This is what a chart is all about ...
Not at all he really means tape. His ghost may comes to find you tonight because you want to mislead all his works.
Lol. If there were no bids and asks, There would have no charts. Bid and asks aren't Tape. It's Deep of Market. Anyway.
The NIV version is better for self defense...... This is funny as heck......a man witnessed a car accident and called his boss to say he was going to be late and left this message on the answering machine.
So you agree he was talking about bid and ask but not chart, finally you surrender that is ok I accept it.