Which Republican Candidate will be best for our economy?

Discussion in 'Economics' started by Maverickz, May 5, 2011.

  1. toc

    toc

    Mitt Romney was a governor of NJ or MS but did not do any spectacular job of turnaround of economy and finances of that state, so we cannot say he is the man who will help the US house.

    Problem is once in WH, the presidents have to tow the agenda of their parties and lobby groups and hance they take decisions which in the depths of their own hearts and minds, they do not like or agree.

    Only one man has the ability to show his big finger with a twice as big verbal FU to any pressure and that man in Donald Trump. US needs hard decision makers who have the ability to look beyond any political nonsense. Trump fits that bill well.

    I hope Brarak Obama is not reelected. He does not seem to gain respect from the circles and thus is not able to provide strong leadership that US needs at the moment.

    :D :cool: :p
     
    #11     May 5, 2011
  2. "Which would be best for the economy?" is the wrong question.

    The correct question, "Which would make strides to return the country to the principles of the Constitution?" Doing so wouldn't be any fun for quite a while... and lots of tit-sucking parasites would get all bent out of shape.

    However, failure to do so means the Republic of The United States fails and dies.
     
    #12     May 6, 2011
  3. sumfuka

    sumfuka

    TRUMP :D

    Our politicians are a bunch of clowns, might as well pick the funniest one.

    government and economy just doesn't mix well. Government would always fuck up the economy. Economy would always corrupt the government.
     
    #13     May 6, 2011
  4. Trump

    No question.
     
    #14     May 6, 2011
  5. ANYONE who will STOP the FAKE CON JOB war on terror and destroy all ties to GLOBALIST codependency! :cool:

    Michael Springman (former head U.S. consular official in Jeddah, Saudi) : CIA Ordered Visas For 15 of The 19 9/11 Hijackers in Jeddah.........

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmjAg_-Vi9Y



    ANYONE who will get the FU(#ing TSA out of our airports!!!!!!!!!!

    Flight 253 The US Government Escorted Abumutallab Through Security Without A Passport............

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_k6lhuC2ms



    ANYONE who will FIRE "Big FAT ASS Sis" and SHUTDOWN DHS!!!

    Wal-Mart Invasion Part of Larger DHS Takeover of America..........

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntCYiegLcxw



    ANYONE who will END THE FED!!!!!!!!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65Vkqcrfh9A
     
    #15     May 6, 2011
  6. A women who thinks a presidential trip costs 200 million per day doesn't know economics very well
     
    #16     May 6, 2011
  7. A guy who says his net worth depends on how he feels,has filed numerous bankruptcies and has caused huge loses for his investors certainly isn't the guy

    I think Trumps plan for the national debt is for the US to file bankruptcy
     
    #17     May 6, 2011
  8. All things we need, but the current gaggle of political clowns are unlikely to do ANY of them. :(
     
    #18     May 6, 2011
  9. None of the candidates appear ready to make the tough choices, which makes them all pretty much equally undesirable.
     
    #19     May 6, 2011
  10. piezoe

    piezoe

    Several candidates have unrealistic expectations. It would be impossible for them to implement their ideas (whether good or bad is a another question entirely) without a drastic change in the nature of the U.S. government. I too am an admirer of Paul because of his transparency, seeming honesty and liberal nature, though I can't throw my vote away.

    Many of the potential candidates truly scare me for different reasons: Pawlenty for his purely, "pretty face" political nature, lack of backbone and transparency; Trump for his duplicitous nature (He is a pathological liar and exaggerator.), his lack of polish and intellectual capability and for the embarrassment he would bring, like an ill mannered George W. or a Berlusconi; the Arkansas preacher (still another no show) remains one of the more threatening candidates because he has an outside chance to win) for the impossibility of him accepting the U.S. as a secular country, and his warped, Baptist, moralistic outlook; Gingrich for his evil nature; and Romney for being able to hide his ego and real intentions so cleverly. Bachmann I know nothing about, but haven't seen anything to suggest she should be President. Santorum, no thank you.

    So far, a dismal field of candidates -- Possibly highly electable by a dismal, poorly educated electorate.
     
    #20     May 6, 2011