Which Presidential candidate is better for the economy if elected?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by chaosclarity, Sep 30, 2011.

Who is better for the economy?

  1. Herman Cain

    15 vote(s)
    30.6%
  2. Mitt Romney

    8 vote(s)
    16.3%
  3. Rick Perry

    10 vote(s)
    20.4%
  4. Barrack Obama

    16 vote(s)
    32.7%
  1. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    He's an idiot, but he can't vote. Just another Canadian observer obsessed with our politics.
     
    #41     Oct 2, 2011
  2. Here here.
     
    #42     Oct 2, 2011
  3. ammo

    ammo

    dead before the election takes place,if not then he's a phony, there are no good guys in washington
     
    #43     Oct 2, 2011
  4. Humpy

    Humpy

    I was going to suggest a checklist, like:-

    honesty
    ability
    good ideas

    but that would take out most of the candidates on square 1

    :p
     
    #44     Oct 2, 2011
  5. mfoste1

    mfoste1

    Which presidential candidate is best for the economy? Thats simple....

    Which ever one will keep the ponzi scheme going as long as possible by printing more money. But, it will all be a mirage.....
     
    #45     Oct 2, 2011
  6. mfoste1

    mfoste1


    anyways, hey astronaut, why didnt you include more options on who to vote for? simpleton......
     
    #46     Oct 2, 2011
  7. piezoe

    piezoe

    Bloomberg would be a formidable candidate, but I can't see him running against Obama.
     
    #47     Oct 2, 2011
  8. Ron Paul 2012, the only candidate you can trust at their word. Ron Paul has NEVER voted to raise taxes. He also refused the Congressional pension. In short, he is the kind of man we need in the White House, an incorruptible man of principle.

    As for the limited poll, you could have at least included "other candidate".
     
    #48     Oct 3, 2011
  9. Humpy

    Humpy

    Did you know that 20% of young Americans think Batman is a real person.
    That's probably enough to get him elected !
     
    #49     Oct 3, 2011
  10. Batman was a trust fund baby, he would probably raise taxes.
     
    #50     Oct 3, 2011