Which Presidential candidate is better for the economy if elected?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by chaosclarity, Sep 30, 2011.

Who is better for the economy?

  1. Herman Cain

    15 vote(s)
    30.6%
  2. Mitt Romney

    8 vote(s)
    16.3%
  3. Rick Perry

    10 vote(s)
    20.4%
  4. Barrack Obama

    16 vote(s)
    32.7%
  1. Now I see 7 people who believe that Barrack Obama would be better for the economy. Why would you say that? Lets say we passed the jobs bill today without question or delay. Do you think by passing that bill we would avoid another recession?

    I think there is a lot that Obama could have done to make the economy stronger. In the last three years Obama has concentrated on everything from bullying in schools to healthcare, but he has not addressed the heart of the economy. In fact, it seems like the business world is scared of him. In looking at his so called "signature policies", none of them seem to contribute anything to the greater economy. Like how does healthcare really contribute to jobs and the economy.

    There is only ONE WAY out of this mess and it is to get into bed with big business. It is to hold meetings with the CEOs of the top 100 companies and grant their every wish. It is to get together with the governors of each state and help them get into bed with big business. However, getting into bed with big business who are not large campaign donors is not within the Democrats vocabulary.
     
    #31     Oct 1, 2011
  2. Im not certain about a lot of things about Herman Cain, but I do know he sounds very confident and has the communication skills of a leader. He did manage an enterprise which had tens of thousands of workers over 39 states with 600 locations. He does have real world experience managing a medium sized enterprise. Hey thats better then Obama who has absolutely no experience managing anything or anyone on his economic team. His economic team is all theory and has never practiced what they preached.

    Romney is a wildly successful venture capitalist. How can you go wrong with someone like that? Don't you want a self made millionaire and successful business man at the helm?
     
    #32     Oct 1, 2011
  3. piezoe

    piezoe

    The Pizza background is great, but I think fried chicken would have been even stronger! If Hollywood can write him into a starring role in an action film that can be released during the 2011 Christmas season he'll be unbeatable. :D
     
    #33     Oct 1, 2011
  4. presidents have no influence on the economic cycle. the trick is to get elected after a crash where the base line is low introduce a plan and take all the credit.
     
    #34     Oct 1, 2011
  5. That is the strength of democracy, not a weakness.

    If "considered" votes had counted for more, the US would be a eugenic paradise in close partnership with Fascist Germany.

    Democracy has an achilles heel, but that isn't it.
     
    #35     Oct 1, 2011
  6. Whatever his other qualifications, he's certainly an outspoken bigot.
     
    #36     Oct 1, 2011
  7. ron paul
     
    #37     Oct 1, 2011
  8. Humpy

    Humpy

    Anyone know if the Amish are putting up a candidate ?
     
    #38     Oct 2, 2011
  9. Anyone think Luke would make a good Pres.? :( .
     
    #39     Oct 2, 2011
  10. Of those listed, none of the above. Try again!
     
    #40     Oct 2, 2011