Which Presidential candidate is better for the economy if elected? bachman. she has jezus on her side.
The guy with the biggest slush fund has won the election the last umpteen times. With what policies you may well ask ? With those sort of bribes who the hell cares. Then you got their dummy to put up with, for the next 4 years ! What a crummy system. If it gets half as bad as for Greece then watch out for mega trouble !
It really doesn't matter who is president, we could elect Joe the Plumber, what we really need is a plan. I'm telling you, for a President that spends time talking about a Sputnik momemt he cancels the space program. WTF?
The people funding Ron Paul's campaign are mostly ordinary people who want their country back. The guys with big money who want a politician who will comply with their interests will fund any politician but Ron Paul.
Space shuttle program phaseout was begun under Bush with his "Vision For Space Exploration": http://history.nasa.gov/sep.htm
+1 In the field listed, I guess I'd have to choose Cain. Some of his recent comments (including his admiration for Gingrich) suggest he's much more of an status quo Republican than I hoped, though.
Roark Registered: Jul 2010 Posts: 658 09-30-11 09:09 AM Quote from zdreg: I am glad you recognize bush's contribution to the current mess. when ask why he allowed paulson to go ahead with bailouts bush said he gave up his free market principles to save the system. obama took the ball and ran with it. God help America to wake up. So your're the idiot that voted for Obama? your idiotic response shows that you can't read properly. your handle(roark) can't hide your level of literacy.
You'll have to define "better" more specifically before I can cast a vote. More jobs? Lower deficits? What, exactly? And it might be useful to add a "it won't make any real difference" choice.
+1 If I were to start voting again, it would be for Obama. Yes, Paul has the right idea(s), but they will never be implemented by anyone, even Jesus Christ himself. No, I would vote for the asshole that will bring it all to a conclusion, however ruinous the quickest. With Obama in the hot seat for another four years people just might get angry enough to do something...revolt. Anything else is just prolonging the pain.
I know it's a bit of a liberty from a foreigner but US guys think carefully this time please. You really haven't done too well so far - for instance :- Obama - vastly overspent. Sounds good but has little substance G.W.Bush - moronic warmonger. Spent America for Israel Clinton - womaniser and should not have revoked controls on bankers Bush - not too bad Reagen - he was sensible enough to hire in good help Carter - clueless backwoodsboy Nixon - lying crook Johnson - saddled with a disastrous war Kennedy - vastly overated. Lost Cuba and enterred Vietnam war Eisenhower - steady Truman - failed to use nuclear advantage, lost Arab sympathy etc.