Hi Guys, From the perspective of the length of the test, the TST one looks better that 3arn2trade We can complete it in a month or so ? - what do you say - is that a consideration in choosing ? Also which of the two is easier ?
Depends, TST can be finished sooner, E2T/Helios is more professional and will give you an offer based on your performance in the gauntlet.
I read that TST gives a standard defined funding and Earn2Trade is not defined prior to the gauntlet. So why is Earn2trade better ?
Because their offer is performance based, as it should be? If you finish Harvard with an A and I did community college with Cs, should we get the same job offers?
The one by TST is also a perf based is it not ? They have a combine with perf based rules defined and you have to complete that u get the fund - so that is ok is it not ?
No strict daily, weekly or max loss with E2T. With TST you have to "survive" the draw down rules 3 times before you are actually making money in the funded account. You pay 1 price and the better you perform the better the offer wil be. 1 price, 60 day's. With TST you can finish in 1 month but if you don't you will have to pay again every month. More room to negotiate after some time of trading the funded account.
new requirements in effect you do have a draw down now its 2500 also u must meet better than a 1:1 risk reward. Come on we knew this was coming right. Id still do the Earn2trade over TST though less hoops in terms to profit to jump through TST your a superstar if u can get funded risk reward is over 3x by the time you get through.