Which came first? The chicken or the egg?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by ZZZzzzzzzz, May 26, 2006.

So which came first?

  1. The Chicken

    20 vote(s)
    74.1%
  2. The Chicken Egg

    7 vote(s)
    25.9%
  1. I see the personal attacks continue, as well as the introduction of "mind reading" and arguments from resentments of others, if not yourself.

     
    #61     May 29, 2006
  2. Ricter

    Ricter

    Cry all you want Z. I'm calling a "chicken a chicken". And we've seen the "mind reading" gambit of yours before too.

    I've never met a dumber ass on the internet than you. I guess that's something you might be proud of, since I've been networking from the days we had to put our phone handsets in foam-lined acoustic modems.
     
    #62     May 29, 2006
  3. The personal attacks continue.

    Is this what one would expect from you as to the nature of your logical discourse?

     
    #63     May 29, 2006
  4. Highly unlikely?

    Care to quote me what the odds against it are, and how exactly those odds were calculated?


     
    #64     May 29, 2006
  5. Moderators?
    Why allow this personal bickering to continue to FIVE freakin' pages - and taint such a fun thread?

    Delete all those -oh so most interesting 'mental wrestling' - yet so off topic tripe? Ya need a BICKERING FORUM - so they can take their "fight" to another board.

    Call it FIGHT CLUB?
     
    #65     May 30, 2006
  6. Ricter

    Ricter

    They call it Chit Chat. This forum is the proper place for it. Read the description. You don't have to click this thread. You can start your own. You can also put people on ignore. So quit your whining.

    As for you Z, don't trot out the "logical discourse" play. I'd never claim, while pointing out that you're a stunned goof, that I'm arguing logically, about the original topic, or about you. Only that I'm being accurate.

    People don't lose arguments to you so much as they can never win. That fact makes you the subject. So yes, as long as you're going to act like a beetlebrowed cretin, you're going to draw more interest than your topics.

    Now cry more.
     
    #66     May 30, 2006
  7. Please stop the personal attacks and harassment.

    Thanks.

     
    #67     May 30, 2006
  8. Would you not call this a personal attack? Calling Bitstream a person that types like a moron? This post by you came before Ricter's personal attack on you. It came before your post about grotesque mutants in Southern California. Please enlighten us on how this was not a personal attack. Then you can explain how you would never stoop to personal attacks yourself. You poor victim.
     
    #68     May 30, 2006
  9. No, I wouldn't call it a personal attack at all. Bit and I talk all the time in the chat room, and I am saying the way he writes is not effective in this type of setting, in my opinion.

    I am not calling him a moron who can't write intelligently, and I am not calling him a moron for writing like a moron, I am just asking him not to write like a moron would write. He has a choice, as he is not a moron who has no such choice but to write moronically.

    It would make the dialogues much easier for me. I have asked him previously to write in a more normal manner, and I don't know why he chooses instead to write like a moron writes, but that is his choice. His choice doesn't make him a moron in my estimation, I am sure he has some reason for writing the way he does. I simply don't find it useful, or easy to read and respond to. Language is difficult enough even when we all use it properly.

    What Richter on the other hand did, was engage in a full on personal attack.

    Mine was not a personal attack on Bitstream.

     
    #69     May 30, 2006
  10. Whatever helps you sleep at night.
     
    #70     May 30, 2006