Which came first? The chicken or the egg?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by ZZZzzzzzzz, May 26, 2006.

So which came first?

  1. The Chicken

    20 vote(s)
    74.1%
  2. The Chicken Egg

    7 vote(s)
    25.9%
  1. See, you just lost again....

     
    #161     Jun 9, 2006
  2. Ricter

    Ricter

    "That is your response?

    Oh well....."

    Your reply on page 12. Next?
     
    #162     Jun 9, 2006
  3. You just lost again, quite a habit with you....

     
    #163     Jun 9, 2006
  4. zizzo, how can u dismiss so easily fossil evidence?
    is it all fabricated iyp? there's clear evidence that species have evolved and adapted; how do u explain the fact that Neanderthals bodies were structured perfectly to resist very low temperatures, i.e big noses to build huge amount of mucous to maintain moist nasal cavities durin' harsh winters; very short limbs to retain heat, etc etc....dont u think those characteristics emerged after a long period of adaptation to icy climate? same can be said for the domestic cat...once he begun to hang around humans the body begun to change, and slowly lost all the attributes once necessary to his survival: less heavy skeletal structure, lesser thick coat, etc etc. are u kiddin' uself? this is first hand evidence for gawd sake....animals adapt and change, same humans.
     
    #164     Jun 9, 2006
  5. I don't dismiss old bones.

    I dismiss the people who claim necessarily that these species evolved from lower species, by random chance, with no plan, no design, just a bunch of ooze materializing as if by magic into life forms, then to more advance life forms, yada, yada, yada...

    Is it possible?

    I suppose it is possible, but it is just likely that such a theory of random ignornat chance is impossible.

    So animals adapt and change...to some extent. Why is that?

    Oh yeah, we have no explantion. So is it by random chance that animals and humans adapt?

    Ya right, just a random chance event that there are biological organimsm, and that they try to survive, and that they attempt to adapt...

    There is no way to even calculate the odds over ignorant chance versus intelligent design....

    Hey, if people want to believe it, fine by me. I have no issue with personal belief systems as long as they are not harming others....

     
    #165     Jun 9, 2006
  6. they adapt and change becuase of climate, food and threats...this is not random at all but a very slow process that guarantees animal and plants survival and also ours for that matter.

    for what concerns the odds of intel design, they are astronomical and completely unsupported by evidence.
     
    #166     Jun 9, 2006
  7. Ricter

    Ricter

    You're preaching at the remedial.

    It has been asserting for 10 threads on this topic, and a thousand idiotic replies, that it's too unlikely to happen by "random ignorant chance" (redundant by the way) so it's more likely intelligent design. It has no grasp whatsoever of the laws of physics, and therefore cannot see that errors, ie. chance, can occur within a context of order.

    Ok, back to my movie.
     
    #167     Jun 9, 2006
  8. To paraphrase Britney Spears,

    Ooops, you did it again....

     
    #168     Jun 9, 2006
  9. No, they adapt and change because the can!

    Explain to me why they can adapt and change...and show me that this ability to adapt and change is a product of random ignorant change, and not by design...

    I have no idea why or how you can conclude that the odds of intel design are astronomical.

    You, a mere human with a pea brain like all humans, can calculate the odds of intel design?

    Oy vey...

     
    #169     Jun 9, 2006

  10. oh man, of course they can; they genes mutate when there's the need to guarantee survival...look at plants or insects, they develop new colours that blend with the surroundings as defense from predator and such...is in their genes man, it is internal mechanics.
    go back and study some physics and maybe some botanic, am sure u'll see the light eventually. i cant believe we are even discussin' this stuff.

    and the odds are astronomical because there's not a shred of evidence about your gawd existence. also in physics gawd is considered a singularity and as such it is outside the boundaries of physical laws therefore the most improbable event of all...how's that for terrible odds?

    R0R
     
    #170     Jun 9, 2006