And that older evidence may disprove evolution.... Did you ever think of that? Did that ever enter the pea brain? Show me the painting that is not from a painter (excluding computer generated, which is programmed by a human being) and show me that chicken egg that came from something other than a chicken.... Waiting, waiting, waiting.... p.s. The score is now: Chicken 11 Egg 4
Not at all. Nothing wipes out history, it just shows that the thinking of history was limited.... Who is to say that they wouldn't find evidence of a "higher" species that makes no sense in the projected time line, that blows the theory of evolution out of the water? Open up your mind, don't be fixed in your thinking to such limited two dimensional linear ideas... p.s. Score: Chickens 11 Egg 4
Of course, it was all about the timing issue. But,... hum..errr.....all physical things have something in common called TIME. We are not talking about the chicken's soul here.... The whole question has been about which came first of two physicals, so TIME has to be included. So, again........WE WIN. Thanks ZZzz, it was as always, a pleasure....
Yes, all things have time in common. In time, a hen lays an egg that is fertilized, and in time that egg hatches into a chicken.... So with no doubt, the hen (chicken) came before the egg. p.s. Score still: Chickens 11 Egg 4
You shouldn't talk about "pea brains", dumbass. Four times your brain volume will still fit comfortably inside that. You're stunned with a preconception. For you it's all, "yeah, but what if? what if?"
I think Ricter is completely right. You should try, even if just a little, to open your brain to new ideas and Probabilities. Question: Of all things physical, what is the smallest common denominator? And what does this common denominator look like or represent ? a hen ? ja ja ja ja We (the ones with common sense) won this argument a long time ago.
You do understand the difference between probability and possibility, right? Who determines probability? A bunch of scientists who share the same opinions? LOL.... History has shown without a doubt that a group of scientists are just as fallible as anyone else when they are engaged in speculation.