Which came first? The chicken or the egg?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by ZZZzzzzzzz, May 26, 2006.

So which came first?

  1. The Chicken

    20 vote(s)
    74.1%
  2. The Chicken Egg

    7 vote(s)
    25.9%

  1. way too convinient...have u ever thought that all those improbable events happenin' at the same time that allowed this earth to be born [because that's where we have to go now] are not improbable at all and it is a more common mechanism than u think, maybe happenin' at this point in time elsewhere?
    yeah u don't have any proof, so instead than wait for science to reveal us, u rather look for refuge into god, ROR....u are very lucky that u prolly won't get an answer in your lifetime so that u can carry on deludin' yourself and be happy.

    my, my.
     
    #91     Jun 1, 2006
  2. Improbable to whom?

     
    #92     Jun 1, 2006
  3. jeeez, a mathematical improbablilty...like trowin the dice 1k times and always get 7; if that is not improbable to u, well...
     
    #93     Jun 1, 2006
  4. Ricter

    Ricter

    We have a new human with three arms, and in this case, which occurred during the course of this conversation (rofl), the third arm doesn't look too bad. Might even be operational.

    Not hard to imagine, given enough instances of mutation, a human with two good extra arms. Would it still be human? What if it could only procreate with like individuals, but not with us? Anyway, such visible mutations were likely snuffed out by our ancient ancestors out of pure fear.

    The egg, in mom, came before the new entity, let's call her homo tripiens, lol.
     
    #94     Jun 1, 2006
  5. Keep throwing those dice to evolve a chicken egg out goop....

     
    #95     Jun 1, 2006
  6. Ricter

    Ricter

    Conveniently, you left out the many, many intermediate steps, some of which are evident in the fossil record.

    You're acting like a retard again, but don't take that statement as a personal attack. For one thing, it's an accident of genetics. For another, it could be an evolutionary advantage.
     
    #96     Jun 1, 2006
  7. Conveniently, the evolutionists do the same thing....

     
    #97     Jun 1, 2006
  8. Ricter

    Ricter

    The evolutionists dutifully observe and record every instance of any lifeform they find in the fossil record, and they've been doing that for a long time now. And they will no doubt continue to do so.

    We no more need to have evidence of every instance of transitional species to make sense of the overall process than we need to record our mp3's at CD quality, vs. 128 kbps, to recognize a song.

    Humans are excellent pattern recognizers, but interestingly, not you.
     
    #98     Jun 1, 2006
  9. Please stop your easily recognized pattern of personal attacks.



     
    #99     Jun 1, 2006
  10. Ricter

    Ricter

    You're recognition skills are poor. Not to say they can't be improved. Please go back and reread, and see that I've stated your mental limitations as possible positives, or at least not your fault.

    You're off the hook Z.


    Anyway, the egg came before the new human. Buh bye.
     
    #100     Jun 1, 2006