Where does CL go after Iran attack - where does Economy go?

Thanks Mr. M for all this information. Still trying to digest it all. Pretty scary, not just for the sabre rattling, but for the open concern shown by so many nations involved. This is not a right or left type of thing, but something we all have to be concerned with.

I pray for diplomacy, and pray that our leaders can deal with this with solid, well planned negotiations.

I guess we'll stay tuned as they say, thanks again.



c

 

Very typical - blame on someone else.
do you really think anyone will believe this?
oh lord, delusion beyond our universe

 

cold war tactics

 

china factor - 865 billion dollar oil deals with iran set up a few years prior to 9/11 - this makes war with iran very strategically insane. War with iran will leave china no option but to start instigating aggressive activity against us interests all over the world - bad, bad situation.

this has been the ultimate goal for many global elite groups - war with US vs. china and that is going to change the world as we know it - that is what these sick global elite groups want. Who is the last superpower on the planet not yet dependent or "controled" by the worlds proven destructive central banking system?

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

A: china

 

Russia: “Should Anything Happen to Iran … This Will Be a Direct Threat to Our National Security”

Washington’s Blog
January 15, 2012

Russia and China Would Consider An Attack On Iran – Or Syria – As An Attack On Their National Security

RT notes: The escalating conflict around Iran should be contained by common effort, otherwise the promising Arab Spring will grow into a “scorching Arab Summer,” says Dmitry Rogozin, Russia’s deputy prime minister and former envoy to NATO.

“Iran is our close neighbor, just south of the Caucasus. Should anything happen to Iran, should Iran get drawn into any political or military hardships, this will be a direct threat to our national security,” stressed Rogozin.

Here’s what Rogozin is talking about (notice how close the Southern tip of Russia is to Northern Iran):

http://www.infowars.com/russia-“sho...-a-direct-threat-to-our-national-security”-2/

A Chinese general has also allegedly said that China would launch World War III if Iran is attacked. Andsee this.

While many Americans still believe that our government would not be crazy enough to attack Iran, economic – not national security – considerations may be driving the warmongers.

In addition, Iran and Syria have had a mutual defense pact for years. And China and Russia might also defend Syria if it is attacked. So an attack on Syria could draw Iran into the war … followed by China and Russia.

 

You hit the nail right on the head...


Chicago CTA, I find it hard to believe that you are ignorant enough to think that the people of Iran are the ones calling the shots, in your dreams. Even experts from the middle east will tell you that the mullahs and Ahmadinejad's hard line cronies run the show.

Then to have Mvector post quotes from the infowars makes for a nice SNL skit laugher. By the way, the russian govt loves to talk tough, especially with Putin's egotistic, nationalistic doctrinology behind it.


This site is has become saturated with some of the dumbest ppl I have ever seen, bar none.

 

The only thing wrong with ET is all the AIPAC love children - the can't wait for more globalist central banker lead wars - of course as YOU sit on your ass in degrading miami - :eek:

 

Thank You Ron Paul! Keep pounding away on Iran policy in the debates - so Constitutional principles can be at the top of the discussion!


Is President Obama Being Blackmailed Over Iran Attack?


Monday, January 16, 2012

On Sunday, January 15, CNN reported that “The U.S. military has postponed planned military exercises with Israel ahead of a scheduled visit by the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.”

Is this a sign of cooler heads prevailing in Washington, or a bump in the road to the planned destination, World War III? At this stage, we can only guess.

At lobelog.com, Jim Lobe writes that “we’re seeing some serious distancing by the Obama administration from Israel’s provocations and possibly some serious interest in engagement with Iran, although the latter may be too hopeful a conclusion to reach.”

This shocking new development has made me question my views about U.S. intentions towards Iran, its fractured relationship with the renegade state of Israel, and the overall U.S.-Iranian crisis. This whole situation is just so confusing and crazy that it is hard to make my mind up about who are the villains in this drama, and who are the responsible adults.

In my article yesterday, I asked whether or not the U.S. government is telling the truth or not about the murder of another Iranian nuclear scientist by Israel. Did America have knowledge of Israel’s assassination plot, or not? Is it publicly denouncing this action, but quietly cheering them on? Is America on board with Israel’s broader terror operations? If not, then why is America on the sideline and watching Israel get away with murder? Is this a case of a good cop/bad cop con game? Or is it a marriage made in hell, and an ugly divorce is around the corner?

more - http://www.infowars.com/is-presiden...d-by-israeli-terrorists-and-neocon-war-hawks/

 

Smoking Gun Documents On Iran “Found” By US-Backed Terror Group


Washington’s Blog
Monday, January 16, 2012

The people pushing for war against Iran are the same neocons who pushed for war against Iraq. See thisand this. (They planned both wars at least 20 years ago.)


The IAEA report being trumpted as a casus belli contains no new information, but is based on a re-hashing of old, debunked claims stemming from “laptop documents”.

State Department cables released by Wikileaks reveal that the new IAEA head was heavily backed by the U.S., based upon his promises of fealty to the U.S. Indeed, as we’ve seen in the nuclear energy arena, the IAEA is not a neutral, fact-based organization, but a wholly-captured, political agency.

But where did the documents come from originally?

As Gareth Porter noted in 2008:

The George W. Bush administration has long pushed the “laptop documents” – 1,000 pages of technical documents supposedly from a stolen Iranian laptop – as hard evidence of Iranian intentions to build a nuclear weapon. Now charges based on those documents pose the only remaining obstacles to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) declaring that Iran has resolved all unanswered questions about its nuclear programme.

But those documents have long been regarded with great suspicion by U.S. and foreign analysts. German officials have identified the source of the laptop documents in November 2004 as the Mujahideen e Khalq (MEK), which along with its political arm, the National Council of Resistance in Iran (NCRI), is listed by the U.S. State Department as a terrorist organisation.

Interestingly, the Bush Administration – and especially Dick Cheney – helped to fund the MEK (see confirming articles here and here).

And the New York Times, Washington Post and others are reporting that Rudy Giuliani, former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge, former national security adviser Fran Townsend and former Attorney General Michael Mukasey are supporting the MEK as well.

So the terrorist group which “found” the documents is funded by neoconservatives who want to overthrow Iran. What a coincidence!

And as Gareth Porter notes in the above-linked article, the Mossad may have created the documents in the first place:

There are some indications, moreover, that the MEK obtained the documents not from an Iranian source but from Israel’s Mossad.

One thing is clear: the U.S. and its allies have a long history of using forged documents as an excuse for war.

more - http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012...ich-the-warmongers-are-basing-their-case.html


more - http://www.infowars.com/the-u-s-gov...uments-upon-which-the-warmongers-are-relying/

 

One does not need to forge documents to see why Iran is actively seeking military grade enriched uranium. They have rockets for delivery and now they need nuclear warheads. They have enough oil for electrical power generation.