CoronaVirus App for phones. 6Mil Claim they've had it, not everyone is using the app so likely higher and some in error ofcourse. Flu in the UK runs at 0.024% being 17,000 deaths per year. Based on App 360 deaths / 6Mil = 0.006% that's 1/4 of Flu deaths just based on that. STOP TREATING THIS LIKE A PLAGUE CALM DOWN PEOPLE!!! Just Iphone users aswell I see, so 2X's that east, 12Mil then atleast 1/2 don't realise they've even had it, so 24Mil, not far off the 50% prediction already, nice!!
GT’s Definitive Guide to Panicking During the Coronavirus Pandemic T, calm. ixnay on the caps and exclamation points, lol https://genesiustimes.com/gts-definitive-guide-to-panicking-during-the-coronavirus-pandemic/ https://www.bitchute.com/video/oJSCXoGszSpL/ Alex goes Zen, flute and all.
Screw that, Snowflakes, going to realise they've screwed up the entire world, to save very few old people, well they where never really at risk, more to the point. Then hopefully people will stop listening the being bullied around by the weak and fearful.
I'm all up for fully opening up if there were guarantees that dickheads like you die, instead of the oldies.
Not seeing what the dumbo is all worried about...the more people die, the more room they have for "refugees" and "migrants".
Go ahead Einstein ... tell us why we would never cycle a few periods of social distancing instead of one long one? Tell how the fuck you would know that for each new serious virus, you would never need to cycle periods of shutdown You are such a douchebag when you are wrong. === Nothing I said was wrong... because I wrote in hypotheticals and I read the information in an article by Ivy league doctors.... who were consulting or connected to the CDC. They spoke of the risk of a long period of social distancing being that when the shut down terminated, the virus could spike again. Their concept was that we should consider cycle between shorter social distancing shutdowns and then no shutdown... so you have a chance to build herd immunity.. There is no argument against what they wrote... Its a method that could work depending on transmission rates and other factors of each disease. Obviously the timing of the cycles would be key. Only you and a bunch of follow the leftist leader fools would even argue against an almost axiomatic idea.. How fricken dense are you on this?
I just crunched the UK death rate going into the peak assuming a 60% have no symptoms based on 10% per day growth ( 33% without lock downs ) and a 14day lag, which means the peak is probably already over or next few days just waiting for the 14day incumbation period. And if they don't exceed the NHS Capacity for Ventilators ( got enough beds and Oxygen atleast ) then, it's a big number and I feel sick, if it goes over which is will, then I feel really sick. They didn't start the social distancing till 2 weeks to late, they hadn't allowed for the lag, they didn't flatten the curve in time, this last 2 weeks has pretty much just been a show, but still well under initial estimates so they'll still get a pat on the back, bastards. 12-16K if they get the Ventilators, Max about 34K depending on access. 200-300% more hospital uptake next 2 weeks, than from the start 6weeks ago Deaths lag 4days behind so 3weeks, before deaths start to drop. Defo, 6week lock down!! Chrloraquine, reduce deaths by 90% but no mention, so my guess is too late again.