"Trump's remarks on Saturday are a far cry from a position he took in 2008 when he spoke to CNN's Wolf Blitzer and compared the case for impeaching then-President George W. Bush to Bill Clinton. "I mean -- look at the trouble Bill Clinton got into with something that was totally unimportant. And they tried to impeach him, which was nonsense. And yet Bush got us into this horrible war with lies, by lying, by saying they had weapons of mass destruction, by saying all sorts of things that turned out not to be true." "Asked about the comments during an interview in December, Trump shrugged them off as part of his "obligation" as a businessman. "I'm dubbed as a world-class businessman, which frankly that's what I am, and I got along with everybody. I got along with the Clintons, the Republicans, the Democrats, the liberals, the conservatives. That was my obligation, as a businessman," Trump told NBC's "The Today Show" back then. "But I get along with ... the Clintons and I get along with everybody virtually, because that was -- when I needed approvals, when I needed something from Washington, I always got what I wanted." http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/07/politics/donald-trump-bill-clinton-impeachment-hillary-clinton/
He better not sell you out? The guy has been a lifelong donor to democrat party and to people like Hillary Clinton and Chuck Shumer. If he is elected President I am sure he will implement policies that are consistent with the causes that he has donated to in the past. When you decided to support Trump, you decided to support a guy who donated to Hillary Clinton. That's the guy he is today, and that is the way he will behave. Why complain, because it is the guy who YOU voted for.
So the main problem with Drumpf is Hillary and the dems? His bald-faced lies, his flip flops, his seconds-later denial of those, his policy incoherence, or disastrous policy coherence, no problem with all that stuff?
WILDCHILD...I came to the conclusion a long time ago that TRUMP supported the DEMS for mostly business purposes...it was more of a lucrative position to be in. He use to be Hilary's friend, doesn't look anything close to that anymore...so this could be the real deal. Yes, he did believe in some of the policies of the "left", but he realized those policies were taking the country down at a rapid rate and therefore he's changed his mind. If he does in fact fool all of his supporters, I will declare him MASTER OF HELL!
It's pretty clear what Trump represents and if elected you'll get what you voted for and deserve all consequences ( good and bad ) of that decision. He's clearly questionable for woman and a major negative for Muslims/immigrant families/exporters/Americans on work visas in other countries. He might be very good for anyone working in manufacturing in the US. He may or may not do something about the top 1% monopolizing your nations new wealth; hard to say, he is part of the 1% and his policy statements are rife with inaccuracies. I've already said that higher personal taxes and high medical insurance bills are a given regardless of your leader. You can add much higher consumer prices if the "America first" ideas truly harm or destroy trade deals with other nations. Now it could be that more people work in manufacturing domestically, you have to weigh that trade off, that you will be willing to pay far more for goods "made in the USA". With an aging population, I'm not sure how closing down immigration really works well for the US. Sure, you get lower unemployment, but the quality of that employment may suffer. Who really knows at this point. You might even see large multinationals like AAPL split up into two companies, removing all international operations from the US. You've obviously thought this through and love his ideas. I can't ignore the xenophobia, lack of respect for woman, tendency to stretch the truth to get attention. Maybe he gets some stuff done, maybe he's a golden opportunity for countries like Canada that are doing well to further diversify their trade opportunities and better protect their own economy. It might all work out. If he strikes down the corruption and special interest groups embedded in US politics and Wall Street, I could see that being good, especially if some of his other ideas get blocked or it's truly just bombast and he has no intention of following through on them. If he helps destroy the old school Republican party, that's a good thing too. I don't think he'll be elected but it might be fun to see the fireworks if he is elected. Just remember, if you are successful, you are getting what you see, including the red flags.
I'm not keeping count but Trump has fully flipped his position on a decent list of statements even in just the last week or two. I've seen this sometimes rationalized as intentional "negotiation anchoring", but the growing list of binary flip-flops seems more like he's trying to cultivate any kind of flexibility he needs, and aggressively setting expectations that he shouldn't be held to what he says. Regardless, anyone expecting him to deliver on specific campaign positions can plainly observe that he doesn't give a second thought to defaulting on his obligations, verbal, economic, marital, etc. and will quite possibly even rub it in when he does.
NINE ENDER...I look at our country as slowly bleeding to death...just like a day trader that has good stop loss discipline, but has no edge whatsoever. Does TRUMP have an edge and can he stop the bleeding or does he end up cutting the artery more severely and causing more chaos? It's so hard to just stand here and watch the continuation of the "slow bleeding' and not do anything about it. I know what were getting if the professional politicians stay in power...the same old formulas that over and over promote the "erosion" of a country. Yes, TRUMP comes with much risk. As far as the other stuff...bigotry....disrespect...condescending remarks, much complexity is involved when making decisions about large groups of people and sparing their FEELINGS...while implementing effective strategies at the same time...if he reaches the oval office, I'm pretty sure he'll tone things down. I'm truly shocked at the unpopularity of any entity/person with a "me first attitude"...an attitude of trying to be superior, better, strict toward others, winning attitude, and so forth. I just can't believe that someone's gain is ALWAYS a loss for someone else! Why is trying to be better than the people you're around considered so disrespectful? I figure, if someone puts down a large group of people, that particular group should limit the offence they feel, but if someone offends them to their face...do what they must. Thanks for the exchange....respectfully!
I just heard something about TRUMP wanting to tax the rich more...supposedly he and the rich are o.k. with this...he says?
If Drumpf is ok with paying higher taxes then why doesn't he simply fire most of his accounting staff and start making full, unsheltered tax reports and payments to the IRS? Because he's a hypocrite. (If this argument sounds familiar to some of you, it should.)
Canada just raised taxes for anyone making over $200K 2%, and reduced everyone else 2%. This is an example of a seemingly small change that makes sense. Our previous government was pro-business, far right wing in nature and took things a little too far.