I agree with you no one should be stopped with no cause Its not about actual cause BLM is against stopping POC even with actual cause.... Again you default to the most sinister conclusion...That police are looking to stop without cause. Cops dont want to waste time doing things that are likely not to have results Cops spend all day driving streets they have a pretty good sense of suspicious activity
No,you and your kind do not It is about actual cause BLM is not against stopping POC with actual cause....
You might want to re think that genius (NYs Stop and Frisk stats before being shut down by a federal court) The number of stops increased dramatically in 2008 to over half a million, 88% of which did not result in any fine or conviction, peaking in 2011 to 685,724 stops, again with 88% (603,437) resulting in no conviction. So 9 out of 10 and 603,437 stops resulted in no conviction but according to you cops dont want to waste time doing things that are likely not to have results and cops spend all day driving streets so they have a pretty good sense of suspicious activity
It was actually proved in federal court smart guy https://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/13/nyregion/stop-and-frisk-practice-violated-rights-judge-rules.html Judge Scheindlin concluded that the stops, which soared in number over the last decade as crime continued to decline, demonstrated a widespread disregard for the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, as well as the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause. The judge found that for much of the last decade, patrol officers had stopped innocent people without any objective reason to suspect them of wrongdoing. What you consider sinister,is reality