Wheels Abbott pulls all the stops to change SNOWVID21 Texas narrative

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Cuddles, Mar 2, 2021.

  1. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Well in this case post the Tweet with the source, not just some random, unattributed chart.

    Of course this works better when the Twitter accounts you use as a source are not on the verge of being removed for spreading COVID misinformation.
     
    #11     Mar 4, 2021
    wrbtrader and Ricter like this.
  2. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    Its a no-win proposition. I post a chart with a tweet and you ignore the chart and attack the user. I post a chart by itself and you ignore the chart and shriek about how the source is needed- despite the data being readily available in numerous sources.

    The point, of course, is that you ignore the chart (which is what matters) and just want to discredit the source (which is not at all what matters).

    If Trump was able to tweet and he tweeted "2 + 2 = 4" then the fact that it is Trump is irrelevant to the math that 2+2 does indeed = 4. But you would say "Trump supports injecting bleach and blah blah blah" while ignoring that 2+2=4.

    I don't care about all the other stuff. I just care about 2+2=4. If you can't prove otherwise, you go after the source.

    It's also interesting to know that Ricter supports this method of attack.
     
    #12     Mar 4, 2021
  3. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    There is a solution for you - STOP POSTING NONSENSE FROM CRAP SOURCES THAT YOU FAIL TO ATTRIBUTE.
     
    #13     Mar 4, 2021
    userque likes this.
  4. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    That's the thing. It's not nonsense.

    The solution would be if you were more honest, and actually debated the data presented.

    If I posted something that said "2+2=5" you could call it nonsense. But that's not what happens. We can debate numbers and data, but you won't.

    You can't. And we all know why, brother. We all know why.
     
    #14     Mar 4, 2021
    jem likes this.
  5. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    #15     Mar 4, 2021
  6. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Let’s walk through the typical sequence again...

    • Tsing Tao posts a chart with scrub kings on making questionable claims with no attribution of source.
    • Tsing Tao refuses to provide the source when asked for it because he knows it is crap.
    • We search former the source which is always some COVID-denying Tweeter or Blogger who pushes a continuous stream of bullshiat.
    • We explore the claim original source for the underlying data on the chart and clearly demonstrate the chart does not align with the claimed data source.
    • Tsing Tao just posted more questionable charts from the same COVID-denier Twitter account and demands we debunk the information.
    • Sorry Tsing Tao — we are not going to debunk a continuous stream of junk charts you post from the same Twitter account where we have already demonstrated your first chart to be based on fake data.
     
    Last edited: Mar 4, 2021
    #16     Mar 4, 2021
    Cuddles likes this.
  7. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    Cut and paste again, right futurecurrents? That's all you've got. Post a lie over and over, and hope people accept it. Meanwhile, my request for comment on verifiable data goes unanswered. Again.
     
    #17     Mar 4, 2021
  8. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    #18     Mar 4, 2021
  9. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    GWB, you still there, bro?
     
    #19     Mar 4, 2021
  10. Cuddles

    Cuddles

    word is he'll be blaming the rise of COVID cases on wind power & the green new deal

     
    #20     Mar 4, 2021