I am happy for both of you. By the way @PoopyDeek did even better: $6.7 M last year. Actually he mortgaged his house. Read his posts. Question: What leveraged instruments are you trading? Best to you.
I often think about europe... yours is not a true counter argument - europe is such a mixed bag, plus brexit is the beginning of the end for EU... this shadow will be there until the actual EU collapse.... otherwise the yield will also catch down... I mean where else can they put the money.. and partly to answer this question you see the USD getting stronger - right now the US is the shining spot and is attracting global money so Europe is getting ignored at the moment. I agree on the mega techs, which is why my own port basically shadows qqq 100%.
you have reading comprehension problem... 500 this year... way more than that last year.... investing trading is only verbiage... I rotate in/out of stuff all the time just no need to specify all that.
The main indices, plus a little gold. Nothing special except I'm not a gambler and never have been one though I enjoy taking some risk. I should say howver I know my limits so I have an employee who is dedicated to the stats. With experience you know not all trades are equal and homework will teach a trader when to put the hammer down.
No it is not, investing and trading are different things. I know you are a Chinese migrant so English is not your first language but things don't all just mean whatever you feel like. You are an investor, an active investor then and as the old saying goes, mystery is the refuge of those with no real secrets to tell. Well done with your investing but please do be quiet about your other gambling nonsense.
well, i think it was a counter argument to your statementt about "Stocks P/E's should catch up treasuries P/E" I gave you an example of where it is not the case at all. What you are doing now is trying to retrofit a new fundamental story of why the environment is this and this trying to support your case against my arguments. Theoretically we can go on like this forever. There's always a story to be found when one is trying to explain the universe's behaviour. But to counter your argument again about the end of EU then i would believe it more if i'd actually see eurozone bond market capitulation (or at least higher rates). Current enviorment is actually the opposite. Rates are negative. NEGATIVE!
darn you conveniently commenting on my English from a high ground lol.. you still have reading comprehension problem... I started as a DAYTRADER in 2000 shorting the bubble. of course I know the difference. time frame is irrelevant. right now the best time frame is forever, (until things change, per my mastery judgement). back in 2000 it was intraday, so intraday it was.
we all see negative lol. well - public opinion can be wrong for a long time, no? that's why a unique vision is what makes big money.... this equity vs. bond yield gap is there, i believe because the public has always been educated that 'bonds are safe, stocks are risky'.... they go to they investment advisors and are told the same, because the advisors don't wont to lose their jobs by going against the grain. but eventually the catch up (or catch down) has to happen... money is like water it always flows to the low ground... pensions can't possibly do 7% the minimum to avoid bankruptcy, and they will have to go to the only game in town - equities, especially mega techs. there are not even other places to go. gold/commodities yield nothing; prime real estate markets are already yielding gross rent 2.5%, or below 2% after expenses; private equities have been big disappointment. what else is out there?