i bet if they made up a country and a race and posted only the negatives about them, the could get a hate campaign going , people love to hate ,makes em feel bigger, doesnt matter what race creed color ya pick
Hitler built up his support in post 1914-18 war by accusing the Jews of letting down their country and being responsible for losing the war. Total rubbish but if the people want to believe the lie they will. Somebody else's fault. Even in Shakespeare's play The Merchant of Venice the Jewish money lender got a bad press. In 13th century Europe The Church forbade Christians being money lenders, as indicated in The bible's story of Christ in the Temple's yard of money lenders. So the Jews took it on with Christian support and made themselves wealthy, causing a lot of ill will to themselves. I expect interest rates might have been high or else ( a pound of flesh ). Some of them dressed differently and spoke another language amongst themselves. Almost a state within a state. Did they deserve The Holocaust ? - No Did they make Israel out of someone else's Palestine ? Yes Can they hold on there ? - probably only with USA's support etc.
Actually the British allowed them to "make Israel out of someone else's Palestine", more out of guilt, I suppose, than anything else. As for the hatred, that goes back long before Christ. I don't know that the Egyptians "hated" them any more than any other slave class, but they weren't exactly held in high regard. And if you believe in all the frog stuff and so forth, that wouldn't foster affection.
It's changing. Sheldon Adelson is now putting his weight behind Marco Rubio. Adelson is influential in the Jewish business elite. I think that's exactly right. Generally speaking, the Jewish people are successful everywhere they go, which engenders envy and hate. Their culture places much emphasis on achievement, so they work harder than other groups. From the 1920s to 1960s, elite Ivy Universities placed limits on the number of Jews that could enter. As recent as the 1970s, discrimination against hiring Jews was common practice on wall street. That's why the brilliant Michael Milken couldn't get into the bulge bracket firms despite being virtually the top student in his class at Wharton, so he ended up working at Drexel Burnham Lambert. It's similar to the overseas Chinese not being liked in many parts of Asia that don't speak Chinese: Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, Vietnam, etc. where the Chinese are the minority, but work harder, thus end up owning a disproportionately larger % of the economy relative to their % in the population. Hence, in times of economic recession, the overseas Chinese are scapegoated and hurt during periods of ethnic riots. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transition_to_the_New_Order#Violence_and_Massacres http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_1998_riots_of_Indonesia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/13_May_incident_(Malaysia)
No, but it does mean they knew about it ahead of time but found it not in their interest to let us know. Put that together with your observation in parentheses, and you just may have identified stereotyped behavior that could explain why Jews have a long history of not being liked by non-Jews, no matter how illogical it is to tar an entire ethnic or religious group with the same brush. A friend of mine once said "prejudice is a matter of probabilities". There may be something to that.
There is something called the Jewish Lobby in the USA. This is the strongest and most organised Lobby in the US. They donate lavishly to BOTH parties and thus cannot fail to have influence whichever wins the elections. This Lobby is funded by Jews and the state of Israel. For every emergency in the Middle East the USA is advised by Israel on what to do. With US help they have neutralized Egypt by subsiding the Egyptian army. Beaten back Syria by supporting the current conflict there. Used the US to seriously weaken Iraq. The underdog Shias were supported against the ruling minority Sunni party Of Saddam Hussein. It is an interesting fact that the Jews were offered by the Brits the highlands of Kenya in about 1910, to found a new state of Israel. They rejected the offer and insisted on Palestine ( Jerusalem ). It is only a matter of time before the US goes broke or tires of financing Israel. The Arabs have the numbers and oil money, therefore time is on their side.
I worked in high tech in Southern California for decades. I was encountering what amounted to bullying occasionally, so I read up on bullies modus operendi and how people react to them. I got to where I could take down a workplace bully, give them WAY more stress then they were handing out... so one day I listed all the bullies I'd encountered and realized that three out of four were Jews! That might have something to do with the hatred.
The rest of your post is rubbish but the fallacy in this last statement needs a response. The existential question of Israel is nuclear. It is no longer a matter of conventional arms, number of tanks/aircraft, numbers of troop etc. Its a completely nuclear situation and they don't wait around to be attacked. Take a look at the 6 Day War. They destroyed the entire Egyptian Air Force on the ground in 3 hours. It took about an hour to destroy the Syrian AF and the Jordanian AF only took *minutes* to destroy. Poof all gone. They didn't wait for those planes to take off. With complete air superiority they then destroyed all the russsian tanks in the Sinai. When the Arab Coalition forces were ordered to retreat from the Sinai the IAF napalmed them on the escape routes. Israel doesn't play. Apply that to nuclear scenarios. Meaning that if Cairo, Damascus, Amman, Tehran or Riyadh were to merely *obtain* a nuclear warhead of any kind Israel would most likely attack them immediately, perhaps with nuclear weapons. That is what Bibi has been trying to warn us about. They would not wait to detect a launch or something like that. Just having intelligence that indicated that one or all of those countries simply *possessed* a nuclear weapon will trigger a more or less all-out attack. Its not like the United State doctrine where we absorb a major nuclear attack and then retaliate with a massive counter-strike. Israel is not able to absorb anything so it will lash out. In the past it was been the arab political leadership and the armies that has suffered defeat in conflicts with Israel. Now, however, it will be the actual arab (or persian) populations who will be killed. I don't think Israel is keen on genocide but if it must be genocide I'm certain they would prefer it to be the arabs and not themselves.
Honestly, I think we are misled to think that Israel needs the US. After one of their wars with muzzies they defeated all their attackers and were suing for peace in a way that would expand their borders and influence. The US stepped in with the bullshit Peace Process and affected some tradeoffs that would keep Israel on the NWO's reservation. Israel has been developing it's military ever since, I sincerely doubt that they need the US for anything but low interest loans and they have stated before that if they don't get the low interest loans from the US they will go somewhere else and pay a little more. They attack the shit out of politicians in the US that don't want to loan them money at low rates, calling them Jew haters and stuff like that. I rarely do any handwringing with regard to poor little Israel.
Sorry to hear that. I hate bullies. I've only been a casual acquaintance with 2 Jewish people in my life. Both were women and both were very nice people. I was invited to one of her birthday parties.