This is the final ounce of energy I will waste of this issue.... I HAVE NO WAY OF KNOWING WHETHER OR NOT IT WAS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.... "LARRY" SAYING "PULL-IT" MEANS NOTHING TO ME ... so, that's how our argument will end ... I only wish that you, and anybody who shares similiar views, will be granted the credibility they deserve .... none
good riddance. the owner of the bldg admits pulling it.. and that means nothing... coo coo coo coo coo coo
LOL Dude, you need to quit drinking that kool aid.. Those aren't squibs, that's the outer connections on the trusses failing.... Go check out a few other videos of buildings being demo'd. Do the charges run UP the building, or down ? Oh yeah, so have you figured out the physics yet as to WHY a building will fall at near free fall speed without the aid of expolsives? Here's a clue - on many of the videos one can find, they will point out that if a floor falls to the next one, won't some of that energy be absorbed by the one below.... OK, there's some truth to that. And that's where the deception of gullible people like yourself begins. Because now tell me, what will happen when those TWO floors hit the ONE below it. The one below will absorb some of that energy from the two, but will it have as great of a slowing effect on double the weight? How about when 3 hit 1. Or when 10 hit 1..... Are you getting it yet? Your passion is to be admired. Too bad the logical part of your mind can't seem to get a rein on the passionate part.
Oh yeah, you laughed at notion that there could be an unforseen design flaw that could have contributed to 7 going down from fire and damage the way it did. And I asked you if you were taking the position that the idea of an unforseen design flaw is ridiculous. So answer me now, are you saying that there has never been an unforseen design flaw that resulted in failure?
it depends on where the failure originates you idiot. how can you be this stupid. i am well aware of the momentum of pancaking but... not at free fall speed. why did the firemen in the other bldgs report multiple, multiple explosions? hmmmmmm i wonder. you have never explained symmetry. if little fema fires brought it down... there would be no symmetry. it fell in it footprint. LARRY ADMITS IT.... WHY IS THAT SO HARD???? come on you can put lipstick on a pig... but no one is going to kiss it. you have yet to credibly dismiss his admission. there has never been a modern bldg collapse in this manner due to lil fires like the ones fema describe. and now u are saying a design flaw brought it down?? i liked the voodoo fiction better. well if a design flaw brought it down that is one hell of a coincidence. but explain the symmetry... because there is no way ur lil scoop theory, which you have yet to show any proof of, holds up when u watch the symmetrical collapse. go look at the murrah bldg... talk about a scoop... yet.. half of the bldg remained. if the little scooped fairy tale you brought to light, took down a modern bldg... why is the collapse symmetrical????
this is your stupidest post yet.... im not saying that at all. im saying that is not what brought down 7. i laughed that you think it is a plausible explanation.
Niiice, more name calling. Yes, it matters where the failure originates, and from your so called 'squib' video, one can plainly see where it started. from the middle up. So you're aware of the momentum of pancaking......and yet you still refuse to see the logic of near free fall speed. Pull your head out dude. Think for yourself for a change and quit embarassing yourself... As far as multiple explosions - have you ever heard steel snap? I have, and I can tell you that it does, indeed sound like an explosion. Multiple explosions=multiple truss connectors failing. Symmetry is another red herring. It means nothing, but your 'spiritual leaders' have brainwashed you into believing it is proof of something. It is not... Larry admits nothing. It was an unfortunate choice of words. Show me another building with the same construction design that HASN'T fallen after fire and exterior damage and THEN I'll say hmmm, maybe there's something to this. Any comparison to other buildings is meaningless. The voodoo is your idea - fitting.... Scoop theory - NIST says there was a large chunk taken out when 1 hit some skyway connecting 7 and 1. FEMA says they are uncertain. Photos are out there... Murrah Building - again, different construction. No trusses. It means nothing how it was scooped out. Why do the so-called squibs run up the building, rather than down, as is found in all other demo's?And hy only on 1 corner? Wouldn't that pull it to one side, and 'blow' the whole symmetry idea?
Ok, in all honesty, I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. You're saying that an unforseen design falw is uncapable of causing a failure like this? Not even a hint of a possibility? Not asking if it's a probable cause, just a possibility.
Well , hang on-this building cannot have been 100% unique, in every aspect of its design. There must be some examples, surely.