Piles of evidence as shown in many articles documenting the Minneapolis arson and looting with participants bragging about it on social media. Let's start with the first four of over 1 million Google results for Minneapolis rioters brag about arson. Some participants can be classified as BLM and others as ANTIFA. Staples man pleads guilty to arson of Minneapolis Police Third Precinct Men from Brainerd and Staples are among four defendants federally indicted with conspiracy to commit arson for their alleged roles in burning the Minneapolis Police Department’s Third Precinct building during the May 28 riots following the murder of George Floyd. https://www.grandforksherald.com/ne...to-arson-of-Minneapolis-Police-Third-Precinct From Minneapolis riots to Capitol attack, social media users broadcast their own crimes Craving internet fame, people flaunting lawlessness https://www.startribune.com/from-mi...a-users-broadcast-their-own-crimes/600081117/ When the FBI caught up with Matthew Rupert, it already was sitting on a mountain of evidence implicating the 28-year-old in a crime spree spanning three days and two states. They had Rupert in writing, describing his plans to drive from Galesburg, Ill., to Minneapolis as lawlessness erupted after George Floyd's murder, and then on to Chicago to "riot this mf!!!" They had photos of Rupert posing, head held high, as flames rose in the backdrop. They had video showing him looting a convenience store, doling out explosives to be thrown at police and walking out of a Nicollet Avenue Sprint store declaring, "I lit it on fire." The FBI did not need an informant for the damning evidence — Rupert collected it himself. He posted it on his Facebook account, "El Ricco Rupert," and streamed his actions on Facebook Live for hours. "Nothing like snitching on yourself," one follower remarked. Rupert recently pleaded guilty to arson and faces a five-year minimum federal prison sentence, a conviction built almost entirely on evidence he posted. He is not an aberration. More people are broadcasting their illicit acts on social media, effectively informing on themselves. It's a trend called "performance crime," a bewildering phenomenon often driven by a quest for online clout and not limited to any age group, education level or ideology. (More at above url) Rochester man pleads guilty to arson of Minneapolis pawn shop during 2020 riots https://www.fox9.com/news/rochester...on-of-minneapolis-pawn-shop-during-2020-riots Richfield Man Sentenced To Prison For Arson Of Target Corporation Headquarters https://www.justice.gov/usao-mn/pr/...-prison-arson-target-corporation-headquarters
There are witnesses that do know who the 7% are...They were there and probably recording it Its BLM.... Why would such an pure honest righteous organization allow the 7% to sneak in among their protests, hijack them and forever sully the morality of the protests. How many of the 7% did the pure-hearted, civic minded BLM members record, identify and report to the police authorities.
@gwb-trading and @Mercor hate, with a passion, the BLM organization. They want to justify their hate by looking for a villain within the group. But, When a cop does something wrong, or murders, they won't vilify the whole department, or police nationwide. When a doctor kills, @gwb-trading won't vilify all healthcare workers. This is what hypocrisy, ignorance, and closeted racism looks like.
whoever they were.(eh.eh BLM) its seems that the BLM were allied so much that they did nothing to stop them or to tell them to leave...or walk away from them....maybe you cant walk away from your own maybe you know...were they white supremacist?
Who are the 7%? Were they arrested Doesn't 7% seems like a high number for a wholesome peaceful group