Bit: >you should consider the very likely possibilty of >demolition. all the visual evidence points at that: Actually, the very thing that could convince me of demolition is missing, mising , missing -- and that is the visual evidence of the organized explosives required to slice the outer columns. Those few random windows blowing out in the videos are neither enough to do the job, nor in the right location for the failure sequence. JB
DPT - Have you watched this yet.......... http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries ?
have a look at the wtc core, this is a beautiful and detailed 3d animation of the cores. the columns were H-U-G-E, much more numerous and stronger than nist made them to be. <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/iH811hANp5k"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/iH811hANp5k" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
u are not looking hard enough. there are telling videos that show evidence of cutter charges blowing the outer columns. will find one for u...u are free to choose to see them. also those "squibs" do infact correspond exactly to the very same pivotal reinforced floors designed to prevent total collapse.
Perhaps, except that it collapsed like a souffle, with practically no lateral movement , despite the central column visibly standing after the initial stages, suggesting some high degree of integrity. The whole thing collapsed like an accordian, rather than some monumental segments taking it laterally?
So I see you've conceded the point about the core being covered in concrete all the way to the top. Almost there grasshopper.....
u gotta be kidding me. it was surrounded by concrete, go look at the designs a few pages backs. the animation is stripped of any concrete structure, are u completely blind?
yeah ror, it fella apart like a house of cards. part of the core remained standing cuz the columns were much thicker from the base 'till half way trough. and what stood all collapsed no much later anyways.
Indeed...If you squint enough, you'll see it start to emerge. Kind of like Jesus in a Grilled Cheese Sandwich. This is probably the most relevant statement by a tinfoil-hatter in this thread. Indeed... we are not looking hard enough. The towers were constructed with an exoskeletal structure. The tinfoil-hatters here have become noticeably more agitated every since it was pointed out that slicing through the main support of the building could easily cause the floor or two immediately above the (alleged!!) impact zone to fall, thus triggering the catastrophic collapse. More Google Video to follow...
as usual great post, full of quality content. the plane impact didn't damage the main supports, even the nist knows that. it was the heat according to nist that caused the floors to sag and the columns to bow. u obviously haven't read a page of that report. maybe u also forgot or most likely didn't know that the towers were built with multiple plane crashes in mind.