What really happened ....11 september

Discussion in 'Politics' started by NickBarings, Dec 5, 2006.

  1. the high rise is steel framed.

    i know where u are getting up but given the money at stake and the shabby investigation by the nist there's no conclusive proof that steel weakening was responsible for the collapse. there's just 5 half pages in the nist report explaining the collapse after the pancake crap was deemed impossible and the conclusions are not backed by evidence.

    the fires in the towers were not even close to be high enough to weaken the steel. it's well documented in the nist report that temperatures of the steel analyzed were around 250 degrees. they think steel reached 600+ but they dont know. at least that's what i recall, i will have to dig up links...as i said i will come back later with everything.
     
    #771     Jan 12, 2007
  2. neophyte321

    neophyte321 Guest


    Lord help me, I can't help myself. This thread is the scab you can't stop picking at.

    A few things, A link to www.sec.gov doesn't exactly support your claim that the "government knew". http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1314186#post1314186

    Thank you for the amusement this morn, there are few things more comical and pathetic than someone ridiculing other peoples' intelligence in profoundly stupid ways. "A girl told me this ....."

    :p

    As for insider trading, a lack of insider trading activity would have been a far better indicator of a conspiracy. Have YOU NUTJOBS failed to consider that Al Qaeda and all its supporters, and it has many, might have taken advantage of such a ripe situation?!

    Finally, when I was told that the first plane hit one of the towers, that very first thing that popped into my head was "BIN LADEN!". EVERYONE KNEW THEY WERE TARGETING THE WTC.

    They designed the new buildings in such a way as to be harder to hit for shit's sakes ....

    ........ please dismiss me as another one of the sheeple and not respond, I'm trying to exorcise this thread from my conscious and ignoring me would go a long way toward that end.
     
    #772     Jan 12, 2007
  3. hydro i think u are missing the point.

    if the towers were demolished, and i think this is a very salient argument with staggering implications, means the govt didnt just let it happen but was complicit into a treasonous conspiracy to commit murder.
     
    #773     Jan 12, 2007
  4. lmao the fbi new, have u read the post about the money trail? that is indisputable fact...even scores of govt figures are ourtraged it was not included in the 911 commission report.
     
    #774     Jan 12, 2007
  5. So you talk to retarded girls?... Only a retard would say such a
    stupid thing. You should really try to talk to girls with an IQ over 80...:D
     
    #775     Jan 12, 2007
  6. LMAO.....
     
    #776     Jan 12, 2007


  7. So which is it -

    The FBI, etc were controlled by the bureaucrats and prevented from spreading intel?

    or they will do whatever it takes to bypass constraints?

    It can't be both....

    ANd look up 'stovepiping' and what it means regarding the intel community....
     
    #777     Jan 12, 2007
  8. Have you ever asked ypurself why steel framed buildings (like the WTC) have fire proofing on their trusses, etc?

    Maybe it's because they realize that they CAN be brought down by fires.... Hmmmmm?
     
    #778     Jan 12, 2007

  9. what's so funny....unlike u i am after the truth not any conceivable way and rationalizations to back the claims it was not an inside job.
     
    #779     Jan 12, 2007
  10. dumb = criminal
     
    #780     Jan 12, 2007