What really happened ....11 september

Discussion in 'Politics' started by NickBarings, Dec 5, 2006.

  1. lmaoooooooo.... hey guys you have met your match. meet hiroshi the giant pancake man... he loves pancake theories that even his own side has avoided like kate moss at the shoneys breakfast bar.
     
    #651     Jan 4, 2007
  2. Amazing you keep obsessing on this pancake thing... Get over it.
     
    #652     Jan 4, 2007
  3. traderob

    traderob

    Amazing he can cross the road, let alone anything else.
     
    #653     Jan 4, 2007
  4. That doen't sound very wise and balanced for a moderator.

    Ursa..
     
    #654     Jan 4, 2007
  5. omfg, listen who's talking...half of this sadpants posts are wild accusations of anti-americanism even to his own side and if that wasn't enough of a broken record he felt compelled to dedicate a whole thread to it...total hypocrite.
     
    #655     Jan 4, 2007
  6. Demolished or not, there is very clear proof that 9/11 was known about by government intelligence, more specifically, the FBI. So I would not put it past the Bush admin & the neocons to ensure a collapse of the two buildings.

    www.sec.gov has it, just requires a little searching. I could post the exact link, but what's the fun in that. I have little interest in educating the stubborn & stupid sheep.

    There is more proof out there, like the encounter between the Israeli Mossad and the FBI, but it is less conclusive evidence. Nothing beats when one of the scumbag corrupt regulatory agencies established by those in power, ends up pursuing something like this before the matter is quickly muted. The brainwashed and clueless pawns of the institution were just doing their job.

    Gotta love it when bureaucracy screws itself.
     
    #656     Jan 4, 2007
  7. already posted all the links and facts about 911 insider trading...discussed ad nasueam too!.:)


    check this very thread for additional insite -what really happened...sept11- and for insider trading the -ask questions demand answers- thread...there's tons of info there.
     
    #657     Jan 4, 2007
  8. What is unconfirmed? Doesn't the video confirm that the smoke came from 7? Do you doubt that the firemen said those things about the damage to 7 and their reaction to it?

    So it appears like you are being a Mr empty mind also. I've shown you the evidence, and since it doesn't fit your preconceived notions of what you want to hear, it is dismissed without investigating that there has, in fact, been other steel buildings that failed due to fire. And that 7 didn't fall in 7 seconds.

    I could go on, but what would be the point.....

    You are a TRUE BELIEVER .....
     
    #658     Jan 4, 2007
  9. tough to trust a site that in its first page and first opening paragraph lies blatantly and obviously on purpose about historical facts. hint hint--the madrid bldg was never on fire.
     
    #659     Jan 4, 2007
  10. He can't help it...

    Much like the nicotine addict when they have a cig

    Or an adrenaline addict when they jump from a plane

    Or a heroin addict when they take their hit

    Arguing these weak points obviously give him some kind of rush - endorphins perhaps - that are in some way gratifying to him.

    He's just a junkie....
     
    #660     Jan 4, 2007