What reasoning? I was merely asking whether or not transformers blow. You did the rest yourself. I would call THAT weak..... Because I'm not ruling out the possibility of explosives - you seem to infer this from.... what? But to finish the thought, if one admits that transformers blew, then there also is the possibility that ALL the explosions were. Not for sure, but possible?
The above reasoning Haroki (point 1), to answer your question. I am relieved to see that you understand that the possibility of transformer explosions does not rule out the possibility of explosives. Yet I am shocked that you would dig yourself into the hole of arguing that everyone of the explosions heard is possibly attributable to the transformers. We are not dealing with possibilities here, but rather probabilities, because without the scientific method we are severely hampered in our efforts to uncover the truth. So I would suggest to you, that you think deeply about the probability of each one of those explosions reported being from transformers blowing up.
And here's the big misrepresentation - that it took 9 seconds. I count 15 seconds. seismic data back me up here. http://www.911myths.com/html/seismic_collapse_time.html
Pardon me sir, but your paranoia is showing... So skeptics of the alternative story/believers of the official story are neocon supporters? If so, I believe you need to put your trading guru ZZZzzzz in that group, and I hardly believe he's a neocon supporter...
Please expand your statement.... I believe - but not sure - that the OS is that the collapse caused the pancaking. Correct me if I'm in error. Oh, and include a link so that I can read it, otherwise, it's all just PFFFFFFT