new information to me. would change the picture. the other thing is that with this kind of information and this kind of case you can become a nation wide heroe overnight. the congressman of the year. i do not buy the lack-of-courage story.
i am waiting for the day someone will become a real hero...it may happen, and sooner than we think. gawd willing.
Boston ATC controller speaks out....... http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2006/141206trafficcontroller.htm
Threatening of ones life and their family has proven exceptionally effective throughout history by those who control power. Send an e-mail to former Congressman Scarborough of Florida about this (from "Scarborough Country" MSNBC TV show).
Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D., is professor emeritus at Texas A&M University and former director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis headquartered in Dallas, TX. He served as chief economist for the US Department of Labor during 2001â2, George W. Bush's first term. http://www.lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds12.html "To explain the unanticipated free-fall collapses of the twin towers at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, mainstream experts (also see The American Professional Constructor, October 2004, pp. 12â18) offer a three-stage argument: 1) an airplane impact weakened each structure, 2) an intense fire thermally weakened structural components that may have suffered damage to fireproofing materials, causing buckling failures, which, in turn, 3) allowed the upper floors to pancake onto the floors below. Many will nod their head, OK, that does it and go back to watching the NBA finals or whatever, but I find this theory just about as satisfying as the fantastic conspiracy theory that "19 young Arabs acting at the behest of Islamist extremists headquartered in distant Afghanistan" caused 9/11. The governmentâs collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms, but its blinkered narrowness and lack of breadth is the paramount defect unshared by its principal scientific rival â controlled demolition. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapses of WTC 1 (North Tower), WTC 2 (South Tower), and the much-overlooked collapse of the 47-story WTC building 7 at 5:21 pm on that fateful day. The scientific controversy over the initial structural weakening has two parts: what caused the original tower damage and did that damage "severely" weaken the structures? Photos show a stable, motionless North Tower (WTC 1) after the damage suffered at 8:46 am and the South Tower after its 9:03 am impact. If we focus on the North Tower, close examination of photos reveals arguably "minor" rather than "severe" damage in the North Tower and its perimeter columns. ....." cont.
"He did not work at Boston Center when 9/11 occurred but still knows people that did who concur with his conclusions". Notice, he did not work at Boston Center when 9/11 occurred... So his view is all hearsay...
I know what really happened on 9/11... Two airplanes drove into the WTC towers. They got hot and burned. The steel inside became very hot and melted which made the buildings fall down. Many innocent people died that day. My son was 3 years old at the time. He told me this... Yes, even a 3 year old understands what happened on 9/11...
i am very interested in evidence and - really - i am still open to arguments. nevertheless i think that we guys here really can not perfectly judge what happened to an extent to entitle name giving. did you guys ever read the leuchter report on auschwitz lie? sounds really convincing somehow. then see the documentation on fred leuchter and everything just vanishes. what i am trying to say is: be sceptic to both sides in an emotional case like this. it is not necessary that people are lying, just maybe have some distortion of their memory due to preformed opinion. just consider the lieutenant had said: "as if they had ordered that we stay down." cut out part of it and you have "evidence". no intentional misunderstanding. just normal stuff. but in this context: morning of 911, norad center, lieutenant "orders", things start to get a meaning that never was there.