What really happened ....11 september

Discussion in 'Politics' started by NickBarings, Dec 5, 2006.

  1. its "applaud" dumbass... maybe you should have gone the public school route?

    that night really got to you i see. you were outsmarted by a moron from public school. LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL

    i have a new name for you, "Precious"... omg.. that is perfect.:)
     
    #231     Dec 11, 2006
  2. Still waiting for that ONE co-conspirator to come forth. Just one out of the obvious THOUSANDS it would have taken. Just one! I guess it's just mass mind control.:eek:
     
    #232     Dec 11, 2006
  3. From Wiki:

    Occam's razor states that the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating, or "shaving off", those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the explanatory hypothesis or theory. In short, when given two equally valid explanations for a phenomenon, one should embrace the less complicated formulation.

    So now I guess it comes down to what was less complicated.....

    1. Terrorists decide to teach America a lesson-they decide to fly planes into buildings.
    2.they come to America and take some flying lessons. they can't take off and land for shit , but they can fly...
    3.US intelligence isn't able to talk the FBI to prevent it-Gorelick's little contribution.
    4. and anyways, being in the US and taking flying lessons isn't against the law, so it would be dificult to arrest them anyway.
    5. they succed, the buildings burn enough to warp the joists, causing failure of 1, then 2,3,4 joists. and a chainreaction results that brings down all 3 , similarly built buildings.

    or

    1.Neocons decide they need a new PH to enact the changes that will result in some mystical new world order where they will be able to control everyone's life , with the help of Mossad, the International Zionists Bankers Union, etc, etc...
    2.they also decide they need to invade Iraq to secure its' oil. and hey let's throw up a smoke screen in Afghanistan too to hide our true intentions of wanting to line the pockets of our oil buddies. so don't forget to incriminate al-quaeda
    3.let's wire up all 3 buildings now with explosives, but be sure to drop then in their own footprints, because we want to minimize the losses. and besides, according to our demo experts, all buildings fall that way, so it shouldn't cause any suspicion..
    4.ok boys, we're gonna power down WTC 1and 2 for 5 days, get Jeb's advice on how to fix it up, after all, he was part owner of a security frm that worked there once.
    5. let's go wire it up, it should only take us 2-300 guys to get it done in 5 days? good, we're the govt, and we're not what others think we are and so it shouldn't be a problem. and oh yeah, nobody can ever leak it out, like what's happening over at that damn CIA every other week...
    6. shoot, we forgot about the people on the plane. well let's buy them off, we're sure that none of them ever want to see their family again. get them to make some fake phone calls too...
    7. ok , we wired them up 5,6,7 days ago, let's wait until Tuesday to blow it. that way, it's all day monday for some janitor to find our explosives. and if they don't, we're good.....
    8. do we have the remote controls all ready on the planes? good. do we have some passports and body parts from the people we paid off to throw around at the crash sites? good.
    9. looks like we're good to go.....

    When you look at the entire plan there, it kinda falls apart using Occam, eh?
     
    #233     Dec 11, 2006
  4. What's lost in all this is that the moonbats deride Bush and his cohorts - Cheney, the now departed Rumsfeld, Rice, et al - and all the alphabet agencies (CIA, etc.) for their incompetence, lack of intelligence, and negligence on umpteen issues YET they willingly believe that the same mentally-challenged President and his cronies had the intelligence and cunning to plan and execute the 9/11 attack and hide all evidence of having done so.

    Utter lunacy, but of course they reside in the World of Denial.
     
    #234     Dec 11, 2006
  5. couldn't you also flip occams razor there and ask, what's simpler: orchestrating a vast governmental conspiracy, or sitting on what you know and letting a politically expedient attack transpire, in other words, do nothing
     
    #235     Dec 11, 2006
  6. Which only goes to prove that Cheney, Bush, Rummy and the rest are Alien Beings from a far away galaxy. How else could this have occurred without detection, or any leaks afterwards. Yep! All those people that conspired are back home on planet Whack Job yukking it up. It's only a matter of time before they take over planet earth. Rumor has it they want to make earth some kind of vacation spot for the wealthy aliens from around the universe. Fucking developers, they're everywhere.:D
     
    #236     Dec 11, 2006
  7. gblnking

    gblnking


    Your close, Bush and company are aliens but not looking to create a vacation spot for all the little green men. He's trying to soften up the humans so our new overlords can sweep in and start herding us like cattle. George and the crew are just trying to get in on the ground floor of the "feeder humans" market.
     
    #237     Dec 11, 2006
  8. You hit that one on the head. The lunatic fringe at it's best.

    Sometimes you wonder if these guys just got out of the lunatic asylum...:p
     
    #238     Dec 11, 2006
  9. Ahhh, see now this COULD be much more likely to happen...

    However, you still have the problem with leaks. You know, Bush and the boys aren't out there gathering intel themselves, right?

    Again, using Occam, which is most likely and less complicated.

    1. Gov't was incompetent in stopping 9/11.

    or

    2. The gov't knew fully well what was gonna happen, but EVERYONE that knew the full story is saying nothing.
     
    #239     Dec 11, 2006
  10. ok so it seems like we've reduced the 2 side of the equation by an order of complexity, down from a vast conspiracy to a more objective assumption that everyone who knows isn't talking. does 2 now also contain a corollary assumption that anyone outside bush's cabinet was complicit as well? or an assumption that his intelligence was anything more than objective input?

    maybe the 2 side is simpler as 2. the president knew what could happen with incentives not to intervene
     
    #240     Dec 11, 2006