What really happened ....11 september

Discussion in 'Politics' started by NickBarings, Dec 5, 2006.

  1. I bet your dad is reeeeeal proud of you at family gatherings......
     
    #151     Dec 10, 2006
  2. why thank you.. he is quite proud indeed. granted this was taken awhile back... but he is a cool dad.:eek:

    [​IMG]
     
    #152     Dec 10, 2006
  3. I appluad all those who run conspiracy sites and write conspiracy books and sell conspiracy DVDs etc etc. Could there be any easier way to make money than to take advantage of these lunatics?
     
    #153     Dec 10, 2006
  4. man

    man

    i think there should be an official debate. taking place
    in april 2007 in a washington conference room with
    TV stations broadcasting live. material to be presented
    by each side, the offical and the conspiracy, must be
    put on the table at least eight weeks in advance.

    i think this could only make democracy stronger. and
    if it turns out that official arguments are real convincing,
    then many thanks to the conspiracy community which
    enforced government to BE convincing.

    while i see several weak spots in the conspiracy claims,
    i would think that the official WTC7 case is difficult
    either. it is really an unbelievable structural weakness
    if three buildings fall apart the same unprecedented
    way in two completely different ways. and while i see
    the point that different circumstances can add up
    together and have a certain unlikely effect i would like
    to stick to occam's law: in doubt the simpler solution is
    the more likely. so, when three buildings look like as
    being demolished intentionally, then this option should
    at least be investigated as heavily as the one with
    various circumstances coming together.

    but having said that, i still doubt the conspiracy claim,
    since the initial rationale of the trade is too risky a
    strategy for a government to be uncovered. if you
    want to go to war you do that differently. not at home
    with live cameras on all over the place.

    i would see at least some of the conspiracy claims
    analogeous to curve fitting: yes, if you add enough
    unconnected dots, you might think you have something.
    and to a newbie it might sound convincing ...
     
    #154     Dec 10, 2006
  5. and then you have the owner of the the bldg (wtc7) going on national tv and admitting they pulled the bldg.
     
    #155     Dec 10, 2006
  6. i bet you do "appluad" LOL LOL LOL... and sit up.. and beg... and roll over....

    [​IMG]

    thats a good nikki... just like the big poodle tony blair
     
    #156     Dec 10, 2006
  7. #157     Dec 10, 2006
  8. So you think that demo would be the simpler solution - Occam's Razor....

    Go to Implosionworld .com and see how much is involved in demoing a building. In the case of bringing down a building that was a 1/4 mile high, it would've been a MASSIVE undertaking. How is that simpler?

    Find any videos yet?
     
    #158     Dec 10, 2006
  9. Exactly....

    Dumbo says that the CT web sites don't make any money. And then someone else posts an mp3 of Jones that has a commercial 10 minutes in. Uhhhh, earth to lunatics, THAT"S where they make their money. Ya know, increase your listenership, and increase your revenues through advestisements.......
     
    #159     Dec 10, 2006
  10. I have listened to Alex Jones since 1996 and I can tell you that he is NOT AT ALL as you try to portray........he is one of that last few who knows what a responsible citizen under our Constitution is suppose to be doing. Alex Jones is by no means rich in wealth, but he is extremely rich in honor and righteousness.
     
    #160     Dec 10, 2006