you northerners are slowwwwwwwwwwwwwww.... i only beat you by 2 yrs on this call: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=624217&highlight=hillary#post624217 11-09-04 05:16 AM http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=694871&highlight=hillary#post694871 02-27-05 08:39 AM
this ones for you tradernicole.... i know she hates this, LOL LOL LOL: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=774514&highlight=hillary#post774514 06-22-05 02:50 PM
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1040365&highlight=hillary#post1040365 04-15-06 07:51 PM http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1047255&highlight=hillary#post1047255
Now you're beginning to see why the CTers here are so scorned. You are thinking logically in your analysis of both sides' points. This is something the Cters don't do. They begin from a position of BELIEF first, and then fit evidence - by misqouting, ignoring countering evidence, and just outright horrible science that could be challenged by high school physics. Have you noticed that in some of those youtube videos, the speaker says - 'this is the only way this could happen'? But when I watch it, I can think of workable alternetives on the spot. Does this happen to you as well? Sorry, I have no videos to watch, because to tell the truth, putting in that much effort to counter lunatics' claims seems like a waste of time.... At any rate, I've found it better to read and think it through, it gives you a chance review at a pace that allows you to ponder and sbsorb both sides' arguements, and not miss any points. As far as judging whether or not they're serious, do like you said about the theologist, discount his opinion. You'll find that most of the papers supporting the conventional explanation have been written by people with qualifications in the area that they're writing about - engineers writing about engineering, and demolition experts writing about demolition. I don't think that the same can be said of the CTers - they'll have physics professors writing about engineering, etc. Perhaps that's the reason CTers use youtube and Google videos, it's a good way to overwhelm the logical, thinking part of the brain, and is a good way to evoke an emotional response from a group of people that are already primed to believe that Bush and the Zionist Bankers, etc, are pure evil.... Maybe you can find a link to a video, I have no idea. And remember, videos can be edited too....
here's your video, LOL LOL LOL: <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5F1Y6cGRXEs"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5F1Y6cGRXEs" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object> oh wait.... that is a conspiracy. damn dan rather and US courts are conspiracy nuts. LOL LOL LOL
So what ever happened with this case? Was it ever investigated thoroughly? What changes were made in the FBI afterwards? Or did Clinton and Gorelick respond by hamstringing the FBI by erecting barriers that prevented intelligence agents telling law enforcement agents that there were terrorists in the country. Do you even know why that was done? Do you know the logic behind that. Do you know what key player that had a hand in hamstringing the FBI was on the 9/11 commission? Do you know whose national security advisor was caught smuggling Clinton era documents from the National Archive? Do you even have a clue?????
wow... hiroshi sounds like a conspiracy loon now. too funny !!!!!! all these idiots on here that say crap like, "the govt would never do this or that.. blah blah blah".... hello.. wake up people !!! nothing has changed.... same M.O. this chit is formulaic.. human behavior doesn't change.
It's as I suspected, you have nooooo clue...... What happened to the Able Danger report that identified Atta a full year before 9/11. Someone destroyed it.... Any guess whose administration was responsible??? Any guess as to what Hamilton of the 9/11 commission first had to say about the Able Danger findings? And how they changed their story a few days later?
listen to this guy, he's a veteran cia officer with tons of experience and co-founded the marine corps intel. he'll give u a picture of 9/11, cheney and the future of usa u neokons wont like and calling for an attack on iran by israel before xrsmas. listen to him, he thinks cheney is sooo evil he eventually will try to get rid of the president attacking him for alcohol abuse... well he already sorta did just that recently. http://prisonplanet.tv/audio/051206steele.mp3
are you sniffing glue? while you are waddling through the mainstream mud i prefer to find out what is really happening. do you seriously think i am going to waste time analyzing the 9/11 commission as a legitimate effort at seeking the truth? you are still stuck in the dem vs republican smokescreen.... who cares which admin was on deck... they are both shill parties. what about able danger? what about all the fbi whistleblowers? the whole cia not sharing info with the fbi is a wild goose chase. only an idiot would fall for. atta, abramhoff, hopsicker, heroin, airports, gambling boats, false flags, weldon, melanie sloan, schumer, soros, fbi investigations, bob graham....... what do you want to know? you bring up points that require much time to debate... try sticking to one or two questions per post.