Then their is William Rodriguez, a worker at the towers. He now says he heard explosions in the basement but that's not what he said before he became a media star and sued the government. William Rodriguez worked on the basement level of the north tower and was in the building when the first plane struck his building. "We heard a loud rumble, then all of a sudden we heard another rumble like someone moving a whole lot of furniture," Rodriguez said. "And then the elevator opened and a man came into our office and all of his skin was off." http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/11/new.york.terror/ Here he is describing something very different than an explosion. The change in his story came after he became a media star and plaintiff. Conspiracy theorists take quotes out of context in order to sell the idea.
I didn't comment on your posted pic, because I don't follow this thread post by post and don't know what you assert about the pic. What is your position on the picture you posted? JB
very fair response. i would like for them to have tested the steel they smuggled out of there so quickly, but it is gone now. on samples taken from wtc7, jones said thermite was used.
http://www.911myths.com/html/accounts_of_explosions.html The story... There are many, many first-hand accounts of explosions at the WTC, perhaps indicating the existence of pre-positioned bombs. Our take... There are certainly lots of these accounts, but what they prove is another matter. Here are some of our concerns. #1, it's true that lots of people used words like "explosion" and "bomb" to describe what they saw and heard at the WTC, but none of that proves actual explosives were used. You can hear an "explosion" without a bomb being required, and saying something was "like a bomb" doesn't mean you think it was one. Don't believe it? Hereâs some examples of how âbombsâ and âexplosionâ reports arenât necessarily to be taken literally. http://www.911myths.com/html/bombs___not_literally.html #2, of course many quotes display no such doubts, and seem very certain about what theyâve heard. However, not every account you read is accurate. And others are selectively edited, perhaps leaving you with a misleading impression of what the witness truly thinks. Here are a few examples. http://www.911myths.com/html/quote_abuse.html Go to that page, lots of well thought out responses and links that give wild assumptions, misquotes, quotes taken out of context, and quote mining - all common techniques used by cT ers to make a point....
that piece of steel has already been shipped to china and probably recycled into something sitting on a shelf at walmart now !!! LOL ........i wish they had saved it.
you may want to turn up the volume... you can barely hear the explosion in the far off background: <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jnbpz9udYus"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jnbpz9udYus" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
http://www.911myths.com/html/proving_controlled_demolition.html How much evidence do you need to prove controlled demolition? It's an interesting question. Consider these points regarding the collapse of the Lampson Transi-Lift 3 crane (Big Blue). 1. Foreknowledge The crane was being filmed at the time of its collapse. Several seconds before the structure fell, a voice was heard to say "it's coming down". Could he have known about explosives planted on the crane? How else would he know that in less than a minute the crane would collapse? 2. Explosions recorded on video A few moments after the "it's coming down" comment, the video records two or three massive explosions. These can't have been caused by the crane falling, because they occur before the collapse takes place. 3. Witnesses report âbombsâ Could the explosions have been some odd artefact recorded on the video only? No, witnesses reported them too. ANd more..... http://www.911myths.com/collapse2.rm http://www.911myths.com/Big_Blue_Animation.avi
yeah... those guys are reacting to a spider !!!!!!!!!!!!! LMAOOOOOOOOO these fake debunkers that eat pancakes and forget to tell people about nist and fema's disclaimer of "this hypothesis has a low probability of occurrence" .... they crack me up.
(click) batshitgirl Google Video post counter:1002 batshitgirl: I get my information from Google Video!! Everything on Google Video is the truth!!