that's a bad idea. the democratic and republican parties are almost entirely a facade. on the most pressing threats to traditional american ideals, they might as well be the same animal the divisive ideological stances that the media trumpets to differentiate the parties, are already deeply determined and not likely to change significantly, but both sides are moving towards big, intrusive, expensive government, a centrally planned theme, and perpetual war they're the same and they both propagate toxic economic and foreign policy i'm more interested in the nature of a candidate's sponsorship. are they obligated to large corporate and moneyed interests, or can you trust their stance as being more representative of ordinary americans. who do they really represent? in this regard, the media sponsored candidates on both sides are roughly identical. the two party system is failing our country, as most monopolies/oligarchies generally do
Hog, go read the first post in this thread. Apparently you just looked at the thread title and then posted... P.S. And if Hillary was able to suck it up, then the Monica/Bill thing would of never happened and Billy Boy would not be known for the BJ President...lol...
What qualifies her? In one word: AIPAC google that one __________________ Please, I'm not a daytrader, I'm an "Intraday Liquidity Provider" IF YOU HAVE TO ASK THAT, YOU SHOULD NOT BE TRADING OPTIONS!!