Discussion in 'Politics' started by Banjo, Sep 6, 2013.
That's a very interesting article and perspective.
Hopefully you actually understood what the article was about.
My Iq was officially tested at 142, and I speak several languages. I have a Masters degree in political science with an undergrad in finance.
Tell us about yourself and your qualifications.
If you think you are so smart then please tell us what you got out of the article posted in this thread. I doubt if you understood it from what you have been writing in other threads here at ET.
Undoubtedly Israel will now turn down US monetary support, on principle. ; )
The crux of the article is about how Israel is highly alarmed that if Obama cannot garner support for a strike of Syria (because he is highly distrusted as a leader) then there is no way he will be able to garner support to preemptively attack Iran should their nuclear plans require curbing by Israel, and Israel will have to go it alone.
As I said, it was an interesting viewpoint. And speaking of points, what is yours?
Assuming the lean no vote no and half the undecideds do the same it's not looking good for Obomber.
Not that lack of congressional approval has ever stopped his tyranny before.
Most who do not support, or are at least doubtful, are citing Iraq as their reason.
Separate names with a comma.