There are plenty of such mediocre systematic strategies with 1:1 Reward-Risk-Ratio based p.a. on max. Drawdown. This is not good at all, that is why no one is interested here. You would need decades to get rich from and mostly the assumption that it will go forward in so many years from today is totally unrealistic. If you had more experience in systematic strategies you should know this. And one more thing, sales business to attract outside or third party money is as difficult as trading (mostly) and for sure a second seperate business. You cannot do all in a one man show. So you need the right people behind you. Again it is much more difficult to attract a billion from investors than with just a backtest and a mediocre strategy behind. Good luck. But I would not trust in your own strategy if I were you. If you made profits so far you should be just lucky. And now you need to move on to somewhat different. I have seen so many strategies like you have done and presented here. Countless. And do not think you can calculate to high sharpe strategies where you should be rich in no time in the future. Why ? Because the future is usually totally different from past. And backtesting on past data cannot help you. But a sound mind with imagination is more helpful. You should stop here for begging money, you make yourself only laughable and no one takes you seriously in the end. Keep working on yourself.
I can only assume that you are not a programmer , and that you have not tried to backtest any strategy for 15+ years. I only agree with you that "it is not a one man show". So if i trust my creation its up to me. If it is luck or skill its not you to decide but the future results. How can the future be totally different from past, when there is only up and down movement? I am not beging for money. They will come. I am just showing what i have prepared. And they say that ... “Luck Is What Happens When Preparation Meets Opportunity".
Start with a market value of 30x larger, trade it live for 2 years, give us stats, then let's have a conversation. Due to utility, if I take 10K and turn it into 50K in a year nobody should be impressed.
You are not more than a beginner. Such strategies you show here are totally basic ones. That is why I think that. You should better listen to. I backtested even over 120 years of data. I created 10000s of strategies with up to Sharpe 5+ ones, that did work for 1 year in live trading them. But that was 100% luck because the times were in favor of that strategy. It could be totally different outcome. And they do not work anymore. If I backtested more I would know it better that they had no chance to survive. I have 15 years experience in coding systematic strategies and I only trade discretionary now because I learnt it the hard way. It is up to you if you also want to waste your time with systematic algos. My two cents. And if you want to refer to Jim Simons, he had exceptional people behind him and that is so rare, that you cannot say I am like Simons and can repeat it too. It should be more a warning that his edge is totally exploited by himself so you have no chance to do the same because they already captured all Alpha here with their own money. Most interesting edges do disappear very soon. Far too early to get rich from in no time. That is why it does not make sense to be systematic trader. You should trade discretionary, the more discretionary the better. Do not trust anything with hard (and systematic) rules. It does not work for sure (except in the past from curve fitting only, of course).
Its not me against all of you (give us stats,) We are all together. We are all the same. Anyway, as a programmer i wouldnt impressed with a strategy that has not passed 2-3 crises. The only strategy thta i find is an excelent strategy is Thales from Darwinex runing live from 2015. So i will post again in 10 years