What makes a setup “HIGH PROBABILITY” to you?

I sometimes wish I could afford to do that.

Do they all treat you equally?

 

For the most part ..yes. Occasionally I get into an argument with a trade.. invariably I'm at fault .. and we're not even married !

 

How fascinating! Thanks.

 

===What makes a setup “HIGH PROBABILITY” to you?==

all trades by the method are high probability trades, otherwise they would not be part of the method

everything outside of the method - low probability trades (for me), so i do not do them

what rules (setups) included in the method ? - only those which I determined do work most of the time

how did i determined that? - Live+paper trading observations...

eventually one sees (or at least I see ) repeating patterns..

observing the patterns behavior one should eventually discern whats behind it, how and why they form the way they form, and based on that come to certain conclusions which in turn will define the rules of the method

Xela is right - what really works should work in any instrument or time frame, any data (that's why those constant searchers here by many for true data are laughable)

 

Those that are based on behavior: double tops/bottoms, higher lows, lower highs, retracements, reversals, etc

 

for some coaches, it means 100% accuracy trading system.

 

I was thinking the same thing[extremes];
especially from study of an old tek chart named EXTREME ....LOL. NOT a stock tip ;iamnew91its easier on an ETF like QQQ. On a single stock , have to look @ more than 91 things LOL. But since 2015 was a down year................................................................................... figuring today would be mostly down. So if it closes up again that tells me a lot, again