Probably a great idea but we already know we could never count on you testing them to find out whether they work or not.
Who cares . . . they, FuturesTruth doesn't care whether people make money from what they track. It's proven that 95% of the individuals out there can't focus on anything long enough to consistently earn a living trading and that is because 99% of what is offered out there is subjective discretionary crap.
I don't take sides. I only act if people tell me there is a problem. I have no issue with uber's question. I received a complaint about it. But I did not touch it. The post was left where it was until you and fishy decided to trash the thread. This is a free World. You have the right to ask the question, people have the right not to answer, for whatever reason. If an answer was given, but not to your satisfaction, then that's too bad. Move on. Nobody owes you a duty to please you. You think your "simple system" is so great, but I do not see you post your broker T&S. Do you see anybody demand your broker statement? Do you see anybody care? Let it go. If nobody answers your question, that is because one or more of the following reasons: 1. People are not profitable 2. People are not trading 3. people are not traders, they just come here to BS. 4. People are profitable, but don't give a damn about your question 5. People are confused about the system 6. People are confused about you 7. People are making money, but embarrassed about the pitiful amount 8. People are making money, but embarrassed about the obscene amount I am ok with whichever answer you choose to pick. enjoy
Now that's an honest response. Good enough. Good night. P.S. I wasn't trashing the thread, I wanted an answer, and your's is the best any of these Gurus is ever going to give.
Just to make sure everyone understand: Critical thinking is good. Critical questioning is encouraged. Contrary opinion is permitted in a free society. Contrary voices are welcomed on ET. However, not all contrary opinions are the result of critical thinking. Not all the contrary voices are critical questioning. There are threads which are platforms for debate. There are threads that are instructional. (with a theme and focus) In a debate thread, you can argue until all ears are red. In an instructional thread, people work. You can ask questions, you can challenge a theory, you can debunk a methodology. You can propose your counter theory, you can show what works and what doesn't. But I would not allow mindless interference, baseless innuendo, slander or libel. enjoy.
Seriously people. This sounds like jim jones of the peoples temple speak. Classic cult gibberish. It's not US. It's. YOU! Beleve brother. Test it yourself! Crap right out of the David karesh handbook? Think for youself. Don't listen to me is exactly what gurus say. It's a dangerous delusion be careful. Still. ONLY one has come forth with an affirmative answer to the question. The promoter of the method is a V E N D O R. Tums. A VEN DOR.
That's right. Turn it around on the questioners. That LOGIC. Doesn't work in the real world. Sorry charlie.
Almost 3 weeks and no one? That's the only answer we need regardless of what the apologists say. Even those on the inside. LOL!
That's the only answer he is able to give Sushi, because he's just another cult guru (pretty much like all the rest) who can't prove that his system holds water ... the fact that no one has ever posted that they consistently made money with the method and that they were looking for a downtrend during a severe one-way rally last Friday tells me everything I need to know abou the system ... it's a big waste of time. :eek: *** Hey, does anyone rmember that blog that was up several years ago where an alleged student of ProfLogic started a blog and was trying to trade, but he kept losing his ass? We were in the middle of yet another war with the PoorProf, and it was some of the funniest shit I've ever seen. P.S. Notice how I said alleged student? Good, so I'm not libelling the PoorProf, I'm just recounting an incident.