It isn't hard for average people but remember who you are directing that comment to. Jimmy isn't capable of testing any method.
Sounds good (in theory), and works (except for when it doesn't). What's pretty funny is how those logicnoobs pismo and Insearch get in a trade early (like what you're suggesting here) and get tossed of the horse before it starts the big move. Then they come on ET and ask "What happenend?" and ProfLogic berates them, tells them that it's all their fault, and invents (yet another) rule for them to follow. LOL, it's like The Comedy Club on a Tuesday (amature) night. :0)
You really think people are stupid don't you. One only needs to read the thread to see you are lying through that gap in your teeth. No one has been berated and no rules were added.
LOL... this is from a while back (from his arsechum's site) but still funny http://forum.tssupport.com/viewtopi...t=&sid=e320c742cd29b90c63bad883f95af398#22639 As we have already said, Bill Schamp is incompetent. Let me explain why. Bill Schamp absolutely seriously claims that he once almost became a Nobel Prize winner. He also proclaimed himself a professor of logic and a software developer. All at the same time. Obviously, this canât be true, but Bill has his own peculiar perception of reality. Therefore, he cannot objectively assess the situation and our arguments donât mean anything to him. Apart from that, Bill misrepresents facts as is typical of him. and then Frothy's unvelievable response to MC support's scathing reply: "I was nominated by a Nobel committee in Switzerland in 2006 for my research in price movement as it realated to price bars and volume. That isn't the same as winning a Nobel but I wouldn't expect you to understand the difference. I taught logic and problem solving at a corporate level to programmers inside developmental environments. I worked on numerious [sic] software developmental (LOL, developmental ) teams over the last 30 years as well. I can document my experience and my achievements. I'm sorry you feel the necessity to belittle my accomplishments just to justify your position." ROFLMAO. Can you prove that Bill? Or is this fake like your "doctorial" [sic] thesis, as expected from a pathological liar.
OMFG! This post is priceless (you'd seriously had better back it up now!). It goes beyond the fact that both Equalizer and I know that ProfLogic is frabricator of stories (to the poing of outright lieing) or that he is pompous and arrogant and will say and do anything to protect his internet persona (LOL). The man is verging on meglomania and psychosis! :0) *** Nobel Prizes, leading Corporate Software Development Teams and teaching a Perfect Trading System .... OH MY!
Unbelievable, saying that he was nominated in 2006 by the Nobel committee. Does Frothy actually believe his own Bullshit?
If it will help him sell trading systems and hoodwink nOObs, yep. :0) Typical snake oil salesman, in the flesh!
Wow! You really blew the lid off of the whole "ProfLogic Mystique" Equalizer. The noobs (pismo, Insearch) and experienced traders (mehphisto II, Whiskey) can follow ProfLogic's Pied Piper act all they want to (of course they're going to say it doesn't matter so long as they get something from his method). But it does speak to the fact that the man has no integrity, has lied numerous times over the years (which we both know, and is probably the main reason we can's fucking stand him) and is basically making shit up on the fly in his "ProfLogic Thread" to make it seem like he actually has a viable trading system which presents a real edge in the market, when the truth is, he doesn't, he's just a carny salesman.
First price action and price bars would never be something the noble committee would have interest in. Bill schamp also claimed that he was getting a patent on his system. This is pure bullshit. Patent office would never grant such nonsense. Someone hear called him on this lie and he shrunk back into the shadows. It's all here someplace on elite Remember find one lie and amedt of them lurk nearby. Rear metal 2007