My thing is that there really only one way to trade, higher highs and lows and vice versa. Where traders differ is that PL uses the ergodic to define trend. Others use RSI. I use angles. U may use a stochstic. At the end of the day we are trading a trend with respect to whatever time frame we are on. Why the persecution? If noobs get sucked in, all the better. We all gain, noobs gain experience, the rest of us gain profit. The markets will always work this way, you will always gain, either experience or profit. I c a lot of threads of people chasing other people around saying, prove this or that. What is that all about? Nobody owes nobody nothin. Take it, leave it. Noobs aint gonna listen anyway. They will take the same learning curve we all did. Trading is like martial arts, get your azz kicked till you don't get your azz kicked. Next belt, add a contract.
the issue here has nothing to do with the method. Although facts are NO ONE came forward saying the method actually works, is profligcmaster is a VENDOR. He should pay to market his wares regardless of if it works or not.
Actually, that is not true. I don't use a stoch, but OK, point taken. PoorProff is a stealth vendor sucking noobs in and charging tons of dough for books, seminars and related materials, capiche? True Now that's a great quote!
Ah, here's some testimony from one of ProfLogic's students: Be sure to get in on their "PM Party" so you can get the lastest scoop with the auto label generator! ... ROTFLMAO
Yup, its objective and free . . . and you have to be smarter than a 5th grader to use it so that leaves you out.
Yes they did but you ignored them. What I share is free . . . I have no clue how that translates in "fish" but free is free in English.
Yeah Right! Here's an honest, unsolicited review of the good ProfLogic. :eek: Thank you sir, thank you.
To the contrary: I didn't makeup that user ID, and I didn't make that post. It's the truth as presented by someone who has had experience with you and your "perfect" system. LOL