This subject has been plaguing me for awhile now. We have seen how uncivilized and barbaric (I'd love to get an Iraqi chick in bed) Iraqis are since we so graciously removed their brutal tyrant Saddam off of them by the blood of our US soldiers. What if... Saddam was simply a natural progression of leadership among the nation of Iraq? What if... it took the likes of a brutal dictator with his primative means of torture and his army of "thugs" to keep these people subdued? The key what if ... after Bush hands over Iraq to the local people in June, the inner core group of extremely violent Iraqis (who Saddam had subdued during his dictatorship) continue fighting and warring, faction against faction, causing so much civil unrest that the majority of Iraqis clearly see how much better off in comparison they were WITH Saddam in power that they beginning wanting Saddam and his group back in power in order to keep the violent Iraqis in line?? What if Saddam's brutal ways of torture were THE ONLY WAY to deal with and handle this base culture of primative and violent people? What is going to happen to Bush's plan/campaign then?